首页> 外文会议>Geotechnical aspects of underground construction in soft ground >Deep excavations stabilization with ground improvement or cross walls: A comparison of both stabilization methods
【24h】

Deep excavations stabilization with ground improvement or cross walls: A comparison of both stabilization methods

机译:用地面改良或横墙进行的深基坑加固:两种加固方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Deep excavations in soft ground often need stabilization. One of the stabilization method is to use Cross Walls (CW). The CWs act as mega props to reduce wall deflection effectively. The use of CW in deep excavation in Singapore has become more and more popular nowadays due to the highly developed urban landscape and the widespread presence of soft clay. Another popular stabilization method used in Singapore is the Ground Improvement (GI) inside the excavation. This method is based on the gaining of stiffness and resistance by mixing soil, water and cement. The main difference between GI and CW is that the first is based on the improvement of the soil by mixing it with other materials, while the second is based on the improvement of the soil by replacing it with other materials. The objective of this paper is to compare CW and GI as stabilization methods. To do so, firstly the CW and GI stabilization methods will be described, subsequently the pros and cons of the use of each method are presented. This paper does not define a “right and wrong” method; however, it can be used to understand some of the factors that can define the use of one stabilization method or the other.
机译:软土地基中的深基坑经常需要加固。稳定方法之一是使用横墙(CW)。连续波作为巨型支柱有效地减少了墙体的挠度。由于高度发达的城市景观和广泛存在的软粘土,如今在新加坡的深基坑中使用连续波已变得越来越流行。在新加坡使用的另一种流行的稳定方法是基坑内部的地面改良(GI)。该方法基于通过混合土壤,水和水泥获得的刚度和阻力。 GI和CW之间的主要区别在于,第一种是通过将土壤与其他材料混合来改善土壤,而第二种是通过以其他材料替代土壤来改善土壤。本文的目的是比较CW和GI作为稳定方法。为此,首先将描述CW和GI稳定化方法,然后介绍每种方法的利弊。本文没有定义“对与错”的方法。但是,它可以用来理解可以定义使用一种稳定方法或另一种稳定方法的一些因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号