首页> 外文会议>Geosynthetics Conference 2015 >Destructive and Nondestructive Testing of Geosynthetic Clay Liner(GCL) Panel Seams
【24h】

Destructive and Nondestructive Testing of Geosynthetic Clay Liner(GCL) Panel Seams

机译:土工合成粘土衬板 r n(GCL)面板接缝的破坏性和非破坏性测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) panel separation of the overlapping edges has occurred in five known situations when theyrnhave been placed beneath geomembranes exposed to the atmosphere. Exposure time varied from 15 mos.-to-5 yearsrnand the separation distances varied from loss of overlap to as much as 1.2 m. Of course, any amount of physicalrnseparation challenges the concept of a composite liner and should be avoided. The current thinking to prevent panelrnseparation when exposed conditions are necessary is a mechanical bonding (or “seaming”) of the initial overlaps. Thisrnpaper will first address manufacturing of seven different seaming types, aka, procedures. It then introduces seamrnstrength testing methods for GCL seams.rnThe testing methods described herein can be conducted in the laboratory as destructive tests and/or in the field asrnnondestructive tests. Both types can be conducted on GCL seams irrespective of how the seams were made in the field.rnThe destructive test method is used to determine the ultimate tensile strength of the GCL seams. It is straightforward andrnfollows similar procedures of geomembrane seam testing in shear. Results can then be compared to the unseamedrnGCL’s wide width tensile test results and thus a seam efficiency can be calculated.rnIn determining the in-situ GCL seam strength, numerous trials in gripping and evaluating representative samples ofrndifferent thickness, geometry, and stiffness were performed. The resulting recommended field test places the GCL seamrnin a shear mode such that the applied force is less than the ultimate strength in a manner similar to conventionalrnnondestructive geomembrane testing.
机译:重叠边缘的土工合成粘土衬里(GCL)面板在将它们放置在暴露于大气的土工膜下方时,已经发生了五种已知情况。曝光时间从15个月到5年不等,间隔距离从重叠损失到最大1.2 m不等。当然,任何数量的物理分离都对复合衬里的概念提出了挑战,应避免使用。当前的防止在必要的暴露条件下面板分离的想法是初始重叠的机械结合(或“接缝”)。本文将首先介绍七种不同的接缝类型(也称为程序)的制造。然后,它介绍了用于GCL接缝的接缝强度测试方法。本文描述的测试方法可以在实验室中作为破坏性测试和/或在现场进行非破坏性测试。不管在现场如何制作接缝,两种类型都可以在GCL接缝上进行。rn破坏性测试方法用于确定GCL接缝的极限抗拉强度。它很简单,并且遵循类似的土工膜接缝测试程序。然后可以将结果与未缝GCL的宽幅拉伸试验结果进行比较,从而可以计算出接缝效率。在确定原位GCL缝强度时,进行了许多抓握和评估厚度,几何形状和刚度不同的代表性样品的试验。推荐的现场测试结果将GCL接缝置于剪切模式,以使其施加的力小于极限强度,其方式类似于常规的非破坏性土工膜测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号