首页> 外文会议>Fourth International Symposium on Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases (NCGG-4): Science, Control, Policy and Implementation >Trade-off between CO CO2 and CH 2 CH4 under conditions of uncertainty,learning and I4 inerti nertiaa
【24h】

Trade-off between CO CO2 and CH 2 CH4 under conditions of uncertainty,learning and I4 inerti nertiaa

机译:在不确定性,学习和I4惯性的条件下,CO CO2和CH 2 CH4之间的权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although most agree that there are net benefits of a mmulti-gas approach to cli ulti-climatemate changemitigation,there I is still a debate on the trade-offs between different greenhouse gasesGHGs).The debate has mainly centered on the GWPs mmetric,but there have also been discussionsas to whether early mitigation action should be targeted on short lived gases likeetric,mmethane,ozone precursors,or aerosols,or on carbon dioxide.This paper touches upon both tethane,these issues.Using an integrated clihese climate and economic mate model (Mi MiMiC),we a MiC),asssess how unce sess uncertainty and learningabout the climate sensitivitrtainty sensitivity affects the cost-effective trade-off between long-lived and shortlived GHGs (e.g.methane and carbon dioxide),when the expected costs to reach a predefiy predefinedclinedclimate stabilization target are mate mmini inimmiizzed.We find that uncertainty and learning implies thatmethane should be valued higher relative to carbon dioxide in ted.The short run he run,although t ,the effect isquite small.The effect ishe mmoorre pronounced if the uncertainty is increased.W e We also include th e theaspect of energeenergy s y system inertia,imply ystem implyiinng that there is also a trade-off between long-lived aba g abatementcapital (I.e.for carbon dioxide mtementmitigation),and short lived abatement capital (I.e.for itigation),mmethaneethanemitigation).However,this does not change our results significantly.Although short-livedgases should be valuedmmoorre relative to long-lived gases in case of uncertaint and learning,methane in our model is valued less thathan its current GWP value.
机译:尽管大多数人都认为采用多气体方法缓解气候变化有净收益,但我仍在争论不同温室气体之间的权衡问题。该争论主要集中在全球升温潜能值计量上,但是还讨论了是否应将早期减排行动针对短寿命气体,例如甲烷,甲烷,臭氧前体或气溶胶,或二氧化碳。本文涉及了乙烷和这些问题。使用综合的气候和经济伙伴模型(Mi MiMiC),我们是MiC),评估在达到预期成本时,如何应对不确定性和对气候敏感性的了解,对长期性和短期性温室气体(例如甲烷和二氧化碳)的成本敏感性权衡取舍。我们预先确定了一个预先定义好的气候稳定目标,但我们发现不确定性和学习意味着甲烷的价值应比ted中的二氧化碳高。在短期内运行,尽管效果很小,但如果不确定性增加,则效果非常明显。我们还包括了能量系统惯性方面,这意味着要进行权衡。寿命较长的ABA减排资本(即二氧化碳减排)和短期减排资本(即甲烷减排)之间的关系。但是,这并没有显着改变我们的结果。如果存在不确定性和学习性,则在我们的模型中,甲烷的价值小于其当前GWP值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号