首页> 外文会议>The drive to site closure: Critical sustainability concerns and key technical issues >What is the Evidence for Stopping All Monitoring? of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway
【24h】

What is the Evidence for Stopping All Monitoring? of the Vapor Intrusion Pathway

机译:停止所有监视的证据是什么?蒸气侵入途径

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Why are we asking about SAM? 1. Most Ⅵ monitoring is for a: 1.1 Presumed one-time, limited-dur 1.1.1 i.e., That can be used to Predict the future Ⅵ 1.1.1.1 Often making it complex, difficult, costly and lengthy, but 1.1.2 That is always seeking/Goal to: 1.1.2.1 'Stop All Monitoring' i.e., 'Screen-out' based on Prediction 1.1.2.2 Relic of early/initial 'triage' era/period? (still desirable, but...) 1.1.2.3 We will see results from Time Series Analysis-based predictions 2. Does other evidence support the presumed goal of Stopping All Monitoring (while Ⅵ-source remains)?
机译:我们为什么要询问SAM? 1.大多数Ⅵ监测是针对以下方面的:1.1假定的一次有限度dur 1.1.1,即可以用来预测将来的Ⅵ1.1.1.1通常使其变得复杂,困难,昂贵且冗长,但是1.1.2总是在寻求/实现以下目标:1.1.2.1“停止所有监视”,即基于预测的“筛选” 1.1.2.2早期/初始“分类”时代/时期的遗迹? (仍是理想的,但是...)1.1.2.3我们将看到基于时间序列分析的预测的结果。2.是否有其他证据支持“停止所有监视”的既定目标(而Ⅵ源仍然存在)?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号