首页> 外文会议>Data and mobility: trandforming information into intelligent traffic and transportation services >Intelligent Transport System Architecture Different Approaches and Future Trends
【24h】

Intelligent Transport System Architecture Different Approaches and Future Trends

机译:智能交通系统架构的不同方法和未来趋势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

System Architecture for Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) has been an active topic across the globe for many years. There are two basic different approaches to its creation and implementation, represented by the European ITS Framework Architecture, called FRAME, and the National ITS Architecture of the USA. Their principal differences lie in the manner and the flexibility of their use. The challenge Europe is facing is based upon the fact that there are many different states with different needs and it is therefore not possible to create a universal ITS architecture suitable for all of them. For this reason, there is framework architecture at the European level from which national or regional architectures can be created by specific states based on their individual requirements. Thus, the situation varies from state to state. On the other hand, the USA has a fixed ITS architecture, the use of which is obligatory if federal financial support for ITS deployment is desired. This paper aims to compare the two approaches and discusses the developments and ongoing activities to support ITS architecture implementation in Europe.
机译:多年来,智能运输系统(ITS)的系统架构一直是全球范围内的活跃话题。创建和实现它有两种基本的不同方法,以称为FRAME的欧洲ITS框架体系结构和美国的国家ITS体系结构为代表。它们的主要区别在于使用方式和灵活性。欧洲面临的挑战基于这样一个事实,即有许多不同的州有不同的需求,因此不可能创建适合所有国家的通用ITS架构。因此,欧洲存在框架架构,特定国家可以根据其个人要求从中创建国家或区域架构。因此,情况因州而异。另一方面,美国具有固定的ITS架构,如果需要联邦政府对ITS部署的财务支持,则必须使用该架构。本文旨在比较这两种方法,并讨论支持欧洲ITS体系结构实施的发展和正在进行的活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号