首页> 外文会议>Data and knowledge for medical decision support >Simultaneously Authoring and Modeling Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Case Study in the Therapeutic Management of Type 2 Diabetes in France
【24h】

Simultaneously Authoring and Modeling Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Case Study in the Therapeutic Management of Type 2 Diabetes in France

机译:同时编写和模拟临床实践指南:法国2型糖尿病治疗管理中的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

By providing patient-specific advice, clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are expected to promote the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to improve the quality of care. However, produced as texts, often incomplete and ambiguous, CPGs are difficult to translate into the formal knowledge bases (KBs) of CDSSs. The French National Authority for Health (HAS) decided to update CPGs on the management of type 2 diabetes. This work illustrates the simultaneous development of the text and its formal counterpart in a CDSS named RecosDiab. CPGs were elaborated by a working group according to the guideline development methodology. Textual recommendations were graded, either as evidence-based when evidence existed or as consensus-based when acknowledge by the working group. Knowledge modeling was performed following the steps of de-abstraction, disambiguation, and verification of completeness. This last step generated clinical situations not explicitly mentioned in the text and were graded as expert-based. The resulting KB provides therapeutic advice for 805 clinical situations, among which 2 are graded as evidence-based, 37 are consensus-based, and 766 are expert-based. However, because of the amount of expert-based propositions, the HAS did not endorse the system.
机译:通过提供针对患者的建议,临床决策支持系统(CDSS)有望促进临床实践指南(CPG)的实施,以提高护理质量。但是,CPG以文本形式(通常不完整且模棱两可)生成,很难转换为CDSS的正式知识库(KB)。法国国家卫生局(HAS)决定更新有关2型糖尿病管理的CPG。这项工作说明了在名为RecosDiab的CDSS中文本及其正式文本的同步开发。工作组根据准则制定方法拟定了CPG。对文本建议进行分级,如果存在证据,则根据证据进行分类,如果工作组认可,则根据共识进行分级。知识建模是按照抽象,歧义消除和完整性验证的步骤进行的。最后一步产生的临床情况在本文中未明确提及,并被评为专家级。由此产生的知识库为805种临床情况提供了治疗建议,其中2种被评为基于证据,37种基于共识,而766种基于专家。但是,由于专家建议的数量众多,因此HAS不认可该系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号