首页> 外文会议>Conference Proceedings 33; National Conference on Transportation Finance; 20021027-30; Chicago,IL(US) >Meeting the Challenge to Reauthorize the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century: Will System Performance Continue to Be 'Gone with the Wind'?
【24h】

Meeting the Challenge to Reauthorize the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century: Will System Performance Continue to Be 'Gone with the Wind'?

机译:迎接挑战以重新授权21世纪的运输公平法:系统性能是否会继续“随风而逝”?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For the Second National Conference on Transportation Finance in Scottsdale, Arizona, August 20-23, 2000, the team of Bryan Grote, Jeffrey Parker, and David Seltzer prepared an excellent paper on reauthorization opportunities. As the touchstone for their examination, they looked to the madcap, though ultimately frustrating, comedy film Planes, Trains and Automobiles. They saw this comedy as representative of a haphazard U.S. transportation system in need of serious fixing. In my effort to follow in their footsteps, the movie theme I draw on is the classic Gone with the Wind. That triumph of cinematic effort left little room for comedy in portraying an economic system at a crossroads, flawed in its goals and struggling to rebuild a new economic base. At this point in the history of our surface transportation network, the United States may be at its own crossroads, struggling to maintain system condition and performance, with goals not clearly stated and needed resources yet to be identified. This resource paper is intended to spur discussion for the Third National Conference on Transportation Finance. To that end it gathers together material generated from numerous congressional hearings, actual experience in project delivery at the state and local levels, and important academic and economic analyses completed since the 2000 conference. The issues raised here include the following: 1. What should be the goal of reauthorization? 2. Has the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) met the goals of maintaining system condition and performance and improving safety? 3. What funding level will reauthorization need to establish to maintain condition and performance? 4. What measures can reasonably be taken to achieve the goals? It is hoped that this background, together with the presentations and discussions the conference will foster, will help participants come to a consensus on these issues and become effective advocates for the solutions.
机译:在2000年8月20日至23日于亚利桑那州斯科茨代尔举行的第二届全国运输融资全国会议上,布莱恩·格罗特(Bryan Grote),杰弗里·帕克(Jeffrey Parker)和戴维·塞尔兹(David Seltzer)的团队撰写了一篇有关重新授权机会的出色论文。作为考试的试金石,他们看了疯子,尽管最终令人沮丧,但喜剧片《飞机,火车和汽车》。他们认为这部喜剧代表了需要认真修复的杂乱无章的美国运输系统。为了追随他们的脚步,我借鉴的电影主题是经典《飘》。电影工作的胜利使喜剧片刻画十字路口的经济体系,目标存在缺陷并努力重建新的经济基础,因此喜剧的余地很小。在我们地面运输网络历史的这一点上,美国可能正处于自己的十字路口,努力维护系统状况和性能,目标尚未明确阐明,尚需确定所需的资源。本参考资料旨在激发第三届全国运输金融大会的讨论。为此,它收集了许多国会听证会产生的材料,州和地方各级项目交付的实际经验以及自2000年会议以来完成的重要学术和经济分析。这里提出的问题包括:1.重新授权的目标是什么? 2.《 21世纪的运输公平法》(TEA-21)是否达到了维持系统状态和性能以及改善安全性的目标? 3.重新授权需要建立什么资金水平才能维持状况和绩效? 4.可以合理地采取哪些措施实现目标?希望这种背景以及会议将促进的介绍和讨论,将有助于与会者就这些问题达成共识,并成为解决方案的有效倡导者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号