首页> 外文会议>Conference on Computer Image Analysis in the Study of Art; 20080128-29; San Jose,CA(US) >Reflections on praxis and facture in a devotional portrait diptych: A computer analysis of the mirror in Hans Memling's Virgin and Child and Maarten van Nieuwenhove
【24h】

Reflections on praxis and facture in a devotional portrait diptych: A computer analysis of the mirror in Hans Memling's Virgin and Child and Maarten van Nieuwenhove

机译:虔诚的肖像三联画中对实践和断裂的反思:对汉斯·梅姆林的《圣母子》和《马丁·范·尼温霍夫》中镜子的计算机分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hans Memling's 1487 diptych Virgin and Child and Maarten van Nieuwenhove is one of the most celebrated Early Netherlandish paintings, but little is known about the practical use of such objects in late medieval devotional practice. A particular point of debate, spurred by the reflection in the painted convex mirror behind the Virgin, concerns the question if the two hinged panels were to be used while set at an angle, and, if so, at what angle. It was recently discovered that the mirror was not part of the painting's initial design, but instead added later by Memling. We created a simple computer graphics model of the tableau in the diptych to test whether the image reflected in the mirror conformed to the image of the model reflected in the mirror. We find two significant deviations of the depicted mirror from that predicted from our computer model, and this in turn strongly suggests that Memling did not paint the mirror in this diptych while viewing the scene with a model in place, but that the mirror was more likely painted without a model present. In short, our findings support the notion that the mirror was an afterthought. This observation might have implications for the understanding of how the diptych was used in devotional practice, since it affects the ideal viewing angle of the wings for the beholder.
机译:汉斯·梅姆林(Hans Memling)1487年的双联画《圣母子》和《马丁·范·尼乌温霍夫》是荷兰早期最著名的画作之一,但在中世纪晚期的虔诚实践中对此类物品的实际使用知之甚少。争论的一个特殊点是,在维珍女神身后的彩绘凸面镜中的反射引起的问题是,是否要以一定角度使用两个铰接面板,如果是,则使用哪个角度。最近发现镜子不是这幅画最初设计的一部分,而是后来由梅姆林添加的。我们在双连画中创建了一个简单的桌面图形计算机图形模型,以测试反射镜中反射的图像是否与反射镜中反射的模型图像相符。我们发现所描绘的镜子与我们的计算机模型所预测的镜子有两个显着偏差,这反过来又强烈表明,梅姆林在使用适当的模型查看场景时并未在此双联画中画镜子。在没有模型的情况下上漆。简而言之,我们的发现支持镜子是事后思考的观点。该观察结果可能对理解双联画在灵修实践中的使用方式有影响,因为它会影响旁观者的机翼的理想视角。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号