首页> 外文会议>Computing science and statistics >Is Cross-Validation the Best Approach for Principal Component and Ridge Regression?
【24h】

Is Cross-Validation the Best Approach for Principal Component and Ridge Regression?

机译:交叉验证是否是主成分和岭回归的最佳方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A recent study by Frank and Friedman (1993) indicated thatrncross-validated ridge regression performed well whenrncompared to partial least-squares regression and crossvalidatedrnprincipal components regression. Thorpe andrnScharf (1995) consider a number of uncross-validated ridgetypernestimators from an engineering point of view. In thisrnpaper we examine a variety of estimators to see if we can dornas well as or nearly as well as fully cross-validated ridgernregression. We conclude that when the number ofrnparameters does not exceed the number of observations, itrnmay be possible to avoid cross-validation.
机译:Frank and Friedman(1993)的最新研究表明,与部分最小二乘回归和交叉验证的主成分回归相比,交叉验证的岭回归表现良好。 Thorpe andrnScharf(1995)从工程学角度考虑了许多未经交叉验证的脊线类型刺激器。在本文中,我们研究了各种估计量,以了解我们的胸椎是否可以达到或几乎可以与完全交叉验证的岭脊回归相提并论。我们得出结论,当参数的数量不超过观察值的数量时,可以避免交叉验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号