首页> 外文会议>Computing in civil engineering >IMPROVING THE UTILITY AND VALUE OFCAD SOFTWARE FOR DECISION-MAKING ANDDESIGN OF STRUCTURAL FRAMES
【24h】

IMPROVING THE UTILITY AND VALUE OFCAD SOFTWARE FOR DECISION-MAKING ANDDESIGN OF STRUCTURAL FRAMES

机译:提高用于决策和结构框架设计的CAD软件的实用性和价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three-dimensional modeling and visualization software is increasingly being used byrnbuilding designers to represent structural frames and communicate design informationrnupstream to their clients and downstream to suppliers/manufacturers. Although designrnprocesses and design management have been explored extensively per se, the upstream,rnheuristic decision-making stages of design in relation to 3D software appear to be under-researched.rnThis is understandable because the human side of the process is complex andrntherefore less straightforward to map. Nevertheless, decisions made early in the project, suchrnas the choice of structural frame, are critical to the project's overall success. Studies ofrncurrent practice indicate that such decisions tend to be based on heuristic decision-makingrnprocesses rooted in subjectivity and qualitative reasoning. This paper reports therndevelopment of an objective, transparent and systematic selection process that operatesrneffectively within a 3D modeling environment. An innovative framework for simultaneouslyrncomparing the performance of a range of structural options against agreed criteria wasrndeveloped, using the two measures, Importance (I) and Performance (P), which can be usedrnto calculate a Performance Weighted Score (PWS). This framework is a means of assessingrn'soft' factors, alongside the conventional cost and time parameters now used in 4D modeling.rnIt thus provides a useful example of a methodology for integrating 'soft' decision making inrnan otherwise 'hard' software environment.
机译:建筑设计师越来越多地使用三维建模和可视化软件来表示结构框架,并将设计信息上游传达给客户,下游传达给供应商/制造商。尽管对设计过程和设计管理本身已进行了广泛的探索,但与3D软件相关的上游,启发式设计决策阶段似乎仍处于研究不足的阶段。这是可以理解的,因为过程的人性方面很复杂,因此不易直接进行。地图。然而,在项目早期做出的决定,例如结构框架的选择,对于项目的整体成功至关重要。当前实践的研究表明,这样的决策倾向于基于植根于主观和定性推理的启发式决策过程。本文报告了在3D建模环境中有效运行的客观,透明和系统的选择过程的发展情况。开发了一种创新框架,该框架同时使用重要性(I)和绩效(P)这两项指标来比较一系列结构选项的绩效和商定标准,可用于计算绩效加权得分(PWS)。该框架是评估“软”因素的一种手段,以及现在在4D建模中使用的常规成本和时间参数。因此,它为集成“软”决策制定内部或“硬”软件环境的方法提供了一个有用的示例。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Computing in civil engineering》|2005年|1-12|共12页
  • 会议地点 Cancun(MX)
  • 作者单位

    Dept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire,rnLE11 3TU, UK. E-mail: R.Soetanto@lboro.ac.uk;

    rnDept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU,rnUK. E-mail: J.Glass@lboro.ac.uk;

    rnDept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11rn3TU, UK. E-mail: A.R.J.Dainty@lboro.ac.uk;

    rnDept. of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU,rnUK. E-mail: A.D.F.Price@lboro.ac.uk;

    rnHead of Department, Dept of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University,rnLeicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK. E-mail: A.Thorpe@lboro.ac.uk;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Design; decision making; 3D CAD; human factors; structural frame;

    机译:设计;做决定; 3D CAD;人为因素;结构框架;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号