首页> 外文会议>Clinical and translational neurohotonics; neural imaging and sensing; and optogenetics and optical manipulation >Effect of cranial window type on monitoring neurovasculature using laser speckle contrast imaging
【24h】

Effect of cranial window type on monitoring neurovasculature using laser speckle contrast imaging

机译:颅窗类型对激光斑点对比成像监测神经脉管系统的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The cranial window preparation provides optical access to the rodent brain for high-resolution in vivo optical imaging. Two types of cranial windows are commonly employed, namely the open-skull window and thinned-skull window. Chronic in vivo laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) through the cranial window permits characterization of neurovascular morphology and blood flow changes over days or weeks. However, the effects of window type and their long-term stability for in vivo LSCI have not been studied. Here we systematically characterize the effect of each cranial window type on in vivo neurovascular monitoring with LSCI over two weeks. Imaging outcomes for each window were assessed in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), microvessel density (MVD) and total vessel length (TVL). We found that the thinned-skull window required a shorter recovery period (~ 4 days), provided a larger field of view and was a good choice for short-term (i.e. < 10 days) in vivo imaging, but not for the long term because of the confounding effects of skull regrowth after ten days. The open-skull window required a longer recovery period, as made evident by the decrease in window quality within the 10-day period. In spite of this, the open-skull window would be preferable for chronic (i.e. > 10 days) in vivo imaging applications. Overall, this study informs about the pros and cons of each cranial window type for LSCI-based neurovascular imaging.
机译:颅窗准备工作为啮齿动物的大脑提供了光学通道,以进行高分辨率的体内光学成像。通常使用两种类型的颅窗,即开颅窗和薄颅窗。通过颅窗的慢性体内激光散斑对比成像(LSCI)可以表征神经血管的形态和数天或数周的血流变化。但是,尚未研究窗类型的影响及其对体内LSCI的长期稳定性。在这里,我们系统地描述了每种颅窗类型在两周内对使用LSCI进行的体内神经血管监测的影响。根据对比噪声比(CNR),微血管密度(MVD)和总血管长度(TVL)评估每个窗口的成像结果。我们发现颅骨变薄的窗口需要较短的恢复时间(〜4天),提供较大的视野,并且是短期(即<10天)体内成像的不错选择,但对于长期成像则不是这样由于十天后颅骨长出的混杂效应。头骨开窗需要更长的恢复时间,这可以从10天时间内窗质量的下降中看出。尽管如此,对于慢性(即> 10天)体内成像应用而言,优选开颅窗口。总的来说,这项研究说明了基于LSCI的神经血管成像的每种颅窗类型的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号