首页> 外文会议>Center for Chemical Process Safety Annual International Conference; 20030923-25; Scottsdale,AZ(US) >Identifying Criteria to Classify Chemical Mixtures as 'Highly Hazardous' due to Chemical Reactivity
【24h】

Identifying Criteria to Classify Chemical Mixtures as 'Highly Hazardous' due to Chemical Reactivity

机译:确定由于化学反应性将化学混合物归类为“高度危险”的标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper uses 13 sets of calorimeter data to evaluate a variety of common criteria to characterize chemical reactive hazards. The purpose is to "brainstorm " whether a criterion or set of criteria can be used to trigger PSM or RMP requirements for reactive chemicals. Such a criterion must be cost-effective, easy to use, and, ideally, should not rely on additional experimental testing. A total of twelve criteria were considered in this work: NFPA instability rating, experimental heat of reaction, experimental total heat release, instantaneous power density (IPD), reaction onset temperature, total change in temperature, total change in pressure, maximum temperature rate, maximum pressure rate, CHETAH predicted energy, and the Melhem Index (based on the calculated heat of reaction at the equilibrium state, and the Computed Adiabatic Reaction Temperature (CART)). Screening values, mostly selected arbitrarily, were assigned to the criteria. Based on this very limited set of calorimeter data, the following conclusions can be made: 1. No single criterion is likely to be adequate for screening all classes of reactive chemicals. 2. The calculated heat of reaction performed "best" as a single parameter, screening 10 of the 13 systems (77%) using a 100 cal/gm threshold. If the pure material is used (without solvent), then the calculated heat of reaction screens 12 of the 13 systems. 3. The total pressure increase screened 61% of the data sets and experimental heat release screened 54%. Combined, the two criteria screened 77% of the chemicals. 4. The NFPA instability rating combined with the calculated heat of reaction screened 12 of the 13 systems (92%). Adding the total pressure change screened all of the systems (100%), although adding the pressure change requires closed-cell calorimeter data. 5. The Melhem Index does not screen any additional chemicals over the calculated heat of reaction by itself. However, the hazard class of two systems is increased from LOW to INTERMEDIATE by the addition of the CART values. 6. Most of the criteria require experimental data. Many require data from an adiabatic, closed-cell calorimeter. The results of this study are mixed. It might be possible to establish a screening method based on several of the criteria discussed in this paper. However, this would require much more analysis with a much larger set of chemicals prior to establishing a final screening method.
机译:本文使用13组量热仪数据来评估表征化学反应危险的各种通用标准。目的是“头脑风暴”是否可以使用一个标准或一组标准来触发对反应性化学品的PSM或RMP要求。这种标准必须具有成本效益,易于使用,并且在理想情况下,不应依赖其他实验测试。这项工作总共考虑了十二个标准:NFPA不稳定等级,反应实验热,实验总放热,瞬时功率密度(IPD),反应起始温度,温度总变化,总压力变化,最高温度速率,最大压力速率,CHETAH预测的能量和Melhem指数(基于在平衡状态下计算出的反应热和计算绝热反应温度(CART))。筛选值(大多数情况下是任意选择的)已分配给标准。根据这套非常有限的量热仪数据,可以得出以下结论:1.没有一个单一的标准足以筛查所有类别的反应性化学物质。 2.计算出的反应热作为一个参数“最佳”执行,使用100 cal / gm阈值筛选了13个系统中的10个(77%)。如果使用纯净材料(不含溶剂),则计算出的13个系统中的反应筛12的热量。 3.总压力增加屏蔽了数据集的61%,实验放热屏蔽了54%。结合起来,这两个标准筛选了77%的化学物质。 4. NFPA的不稳定性等级与计算出的反应热相结合,筛选出13个系统中的12个(92%)。添加总压力变化可以筛查所有系统(100%),尽管添加压力变化需要闭孔量热计数据。 5.在计算出的反应热中,Melhem Index不会筛选任何其他化学物质。但是,通过添加CART值,将两个系统的危害等级从LOW增加到INTERMEDIATE。 6.大多数标准需要实验数据。许多要求从绝热的闭孔量热仪获得数据。这项研究的结果好坏参半。可能有可能基于本文讨论的几个标准建立筛选方法。但是,在建立最终的筛选方法之前,这将需要使用大量化学药品进行更多分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号