首页> 外文会议>Breast imaging >Performance of Computed Radiography and Direct Digital Radiography in a Screening Setting: Effect on the Screening Indicators
【24h】

Performance of Computed Radiography and Direct Digital Radiography in a Screening Setting: Effect on the Screening Indicators

机译:筛查环境中计算机射线照相和直接数字射线照相的性能:对筛查指标的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A decentralized breast cancer screening program was started in 2002; in 2005 full-field digital mammography (FFDM) was introduced. The mammographic film-screen systems were gradually replaced by both computed radiography (CR) and direct digital mammography (DR). Quality control (QC) following the European Guidelines has been implemented for the technical aspects and for screening indicators. A previous study in our central breast unit (CBU) over the period 2005 till 2008 had shown no significant difference between the screening indicators of film-screen mammography (FSM) and FFDM. Today we are challenged with a variety of different types of mammography systems and questioned whether any difference would be present from cohorts imaged with CR versus DR. Therefore a new retrospective study over the period 2007 till 2009 has been performed, which shows no statistically significant difference in cancer detection rate (CDR), % of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and positive predictive value (PPV) between the CR and DR group, with exception of the recall rate (RR) in the subsequent round (p-value = 0,04).
机译:分散的乳腺癌筛查计划于2002年启动; 2005年,推出了全视野数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)。乳腺X线胶片屏幕系统逐渐被计算机射线照相(CR)和直接数字乳腺X线摄影(DR)所取代。遵循欧洲指南的质量控制(QC)已针对技术方面和筛选指标进行了实施。先前在2005年至2008年间对我们的中央乳腺单元(CBU)进行的研究表明,胶片X线钼靶(FSM)和FFDM的筛查指标之间没有显着差异。今天,我们面临着各种不同类型的乳腺X线摄影系统的挑战,并质疑从CR到DR成像的队列是否会出现任何差异。因此,在2007年至2009年期间进行了一项新的回顾性研究,结果显示CR和DR之间的癌症检出率(CDR),导管原位癌百分比(DCIS)和阳性预测值(PPV)在统计学上无显着差异组,但下一轮的召回率(RR)(p值= 0.04)除外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号