首页> 外文会议>ASME international manufacturing science and engineering conference 2011 >Effect of Element Types on Failure Prediction Using a Stress-Based Forming Limit Curve
【24h】

Effect of Element Types on Failure Prediction Using a Stress-Based Forming Limit Curve

机译:元素类型对基于应力的成形极限曲线预测失效的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Strain-based forming limit diagrams (FLDs) are the traditional tool used to characterize the formability of materials for sheet metal forming processes. However, this failure criterion exhibits a significant strain path dependence. Alternatively, stress-based forming limit diagrams (FLDs) have been proposed and shown to be less sensitive to the deformation path. The stress-based failure criterion can be conveniently implemented in numerical simulations. However, for reliable numerical modeling, the sensitivity of the models to the selection of discretization parameters, in particular, the element type must be assessed. In this paper, Marciniak tests have been numerically simulated to investigate failure prediction using three different element types (shell, solid and solid-shell). Seven different specimen geometries were modeled in order to vary the loading paths. The results show that despite differences in stress calculation assumptions, shell, solid and solid-shell elements do not provide differences in failure prediction when a stress-based failure criterion is used.
机译:基于应变的成形极限图(FLD)是用于表征钣金成形过程中材料可成形性的传统工具。但是,这种破坏准则表现出明显的应变路径依赖性。替代地,已经提出了基于应力的成形极限图(FLD),并且显示出对变形路径不那么敏感。基于应力的破坏准则可以在数值模拟中方便地实现。但是,为了进行可靠的数值建模,必须评估模型对离散化参数(尤其是元素类型)选择的敏感性。在本文中,已对Marciniak测试进行了数值模拟,以研究使用三种不同元素类型(壳,实体和实体壳)进行的故障预测。为了改变加载路径,对七个不同的样品几何形状进行了建模。结果表明,尽管应力计算假设有所不同,但是当使用基于应力的破坏准则时,壳,实体和实体壳单元在破坏预测方面不会提供差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号