【24h】

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF PUMPS

机译:泵寿命周期成本分析的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For a product to be commercially successful and increasingly competitive in this global market place, it is imperative that engineers must understand and design for each phase in the life cycle of a product. The life cycle cost (LCC) of any piece of equipment, such as a pump represents the total cost to procure, install, operate, maintain and dispose of that equipment. For sustainment dominated products or systems, the lifetime energy and/or maintenance costs dominate the life cycle cost as compared to its initial cost. The initial cost is only a fraction of the life cycle cost. Therefore, a due consideration to the life cycle cost issues at product design stage is quite essential. The LCC analysis is recommended only at the product design phase, as up to 80% of product LCC is committed at this phase. A better understanding of the cost components that make up the life cycle cost is expected to provide the product designers an opportunity to considerably reduce product LCC. In this paper, a methodology for LCC analysis based on reliability and maintainability principles has been applied to three different pumps and the results of analysis have been compared. For analysis purpose, two pumps have been selected from the literature and the data available therein is utilized. The third pump is selected from a well known pump manufacturer from India and the required data is obtained directly from the manufacturer. To model the maintenance and repair cost the concept of expected number of failures in a given time interval has been applied. The maintenance and repair cost is estimated for two different maintenance and repair strategies, the renewal/replacement upon failure strategy and minimal repair upon failure strategy and under the conditions of constant failure rate (exponential distribution) in first case and increasing failure rate (Weibull distribution) in the second case. The results obtained have been presented and compared at the end. The methodology presented in this paper is expected to help the pump designers to estimate and compare the life cycle cost of their different design alternatives.
机译:为了使产品在商业上取得成功并在全球市场上具有越来越强的竞争力,工程师必须了解和设计产品生命周期中的每个阶段。任何设备(例如泵)的生命周期成本(LCC)代表该设备的采购,安装,操作,维护和处置的总成本。对于以维持为主导的产品或系统,与初始成本相比,生命周期的能源和/或维护成本主导着生命周期成本。初始成本只是生命周期成本的一小部分。因此,在产品设计阶段应充分考虑生命周期成本问题,这一点至关重要。仅在产品设计阶段才建议进行LCC分析,因为高达80%的产品LCC在此阶段已提交。期望对构成生命周期成本的成本要素有更好的了解,这将为产品设计人员提供一个大幅降低产品LCC的机会。本文将基于可靠性和可维护性原理的LCC分析方法应用于三种不同的泵,并对分析结果进行了比较。为了分析目的,从文献中选择了两个泵,并利用其中的可用数据。第三台泵是从印度的一家知名泵制造商那里选择的,所需数据直接从制造商那里获得。为了对维护和维修成本进行建模,已经应用了给定时间间隔内的预期故障数量的概念。对于两种不同的维护和维修策略,估计维护成本,即在故障策略不变的情况下(指数分布)和故障率不断提高(Weibull分布)的情况下,根据故障策略进行更新/更换,根据故障策略进行最小限度的维修。 ),在第二种情况下。最后介绍了获得的结果并进行了比较。预期本文中介绍的方法将帮助泵设计者估算和比较不同设计方案的生命周期成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号