首页> 外文会议>ASME international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference 2014 >VALIDITY AND PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF WILDE'S COGNITIVE TEAMOLOGY MODEL TO DESIGN TEAM OUTCOMES
【24h】

VALIDITY AND PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF WILDE'S COGNITIVE TEAMOLOGY MODEL TO DESIGN TEAM OUTCOMES

机译:威尔德认知团队模型在设计团队成果中的有效性和预测能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An extensive analysis of the validity of Wilde's Teamology cognitive diversity model was undertaken with 120 teams composed of over 661 participants. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) data was collected using a qualified test over five years from students enrolled in a fourth year capstone design course. Cognitive factor scores using Wilde's Teamology model were calculated from the MBTI data for eight factors associated with Wilde's Information Collection and Decision Making dimensions. Wilde's team formation model was found to nominally contribute 10.2% to the overall prediction of the variance observed in design team outcomes using a linear regression model with a threshold that the cognitive scores must exceed. Wilde's Teamology factors of Imagination ("prophetic, guided by inner fantasies and visions"), Community ("expressive, tactful builder of group moral"), and Evaluation ("uses personal values to distinguish good/bad") were found to be statistically associated to design team outcomes.
机译:对120位由661名参与者组成的团队进行了王尔德团队学认知多样性模型有效性的广泛分析。迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)数据是通过五年的合格测试从参加第四年顶点设计课程的学生中收集的。使用Wilde的Teamology模型从MBTI数据计算与Wilde的信息收集和决策维度相关的八个因素的认知因素得分。使用线性回归模型(其阈值必须超过认知得分),发现王尔德的团队形成模型名义上占设计团队结果中观察到的方差的总体预测的10.2%。王尔德的想象力(“预言,由内心的幻想和愿景引导”),社区(“表达力,机智的群体道德建设者”)和评估(“使用个人价值观区分好/坏”)的团队学因素在统计上被发现与设计团队的成果相关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号