【24h】

CFD SIMULATIONS OF BREAKING STOKES WAVES

机译:破损波动的CFD模拟

获取原文

摘要

Free surface flow simulations using CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) can be categorized into two approaches in terms of free surface modeling. One is a two-phase flow model which solves both water and air. The other is a single-phase approach in which only the water region is solved with free surface boundary conditions. Breaking waves have been simulated by many researchers using CFD techniques with two-phase flow models in the most cases. In ship flow CFD applications, however, a single-phase approach is often used since this is considered to be more effective and efficient. However, when a single-phase method is applied to flows with bow wave breaking of a blunt ship, it is observed in some cases that numerical solutions fail to reproduce wave breaking well. This may be due to the differences of the air-water interface treatment between two-phase and single-phase approaches. To investigate these differences, breaking of Stokes waves is simulated by using both single-phase and two-phase flow models. The comparisons of single-phase and two-phase approaches are made in wave profiles, pressure and vorticity distributions. The velocity distributions near the free surface boundaries are also compared. Through these comparisons, impact of free surface boundary conditions in a single-phase approach to wave breaking phenomena is discussed.
机译:就自由表面建模而言,使用CFD(计算流体动力学)进行的自由表面流动模拟可分为两种方法。一种是求解水和空气的两相流模型。另一种是单阶段方法,其中只有水域在自由表面边界条件下才能求解。在大多数情况下,许多研究人员使用CFD技术和两相流模型模拟了碎波。但是,在船流CFD应用中,通常使用单阶段方法,因为这被认为更加有效。但是,当将单相方法应用于钝船的船首破波流时,在某些情况下会发现数值解不能很好地再现破波。这可能是由于两相和单相方法之间的空气-水界面处理不同。为了研究这些差异,通过使用单相和两相流动模型来模拟斯托克斯波的破裂。在波廓,压力和涡度分布方面对单相和两相方法进行了比较。还比较了自由表面边界附近的速度分布。通过这些比较,讨论了自由表面边界条件在单相方法中对破波现象的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号