首页> 外文会议>ASIST 2015: information science with impact >Learning User-Defined, Domain-Specific Relations: A Situated Case Study and Evaluation in Plant Science
【24h】

Learning User-Defined, Domain-Specific Relations: A Situated Case Study and Evaluation in Plant Science

机译:学习用户定义的,特定领域的关系:植物科学中的案例研究和评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although methods exist to identify well-defined relations, such as is_a or part_of, existing tools rarely support a user who wants to define new, domain-specific relations. We conducted a situated case study in plant science and introduce four new domain-specific relations that are of interest to domain scientists but have not been explored in information science. Results show that precision varies between relations and ranges from 0.73 to 0.91 for the manufacturer location category, 0.89 and 0.93 for the seed donor-bank relation, 0.29 and 0.67 for the seed origin location, and 0.32 and 0.77 for the field experiment location. The manufacturer location category recall varies from 0.91 to 0.94, the seed bank-donor location recall ranges between 0.93 and 1, the seed origin relation from 0.33 to 0.82 while the field experiment location from 0.67 to 0.83 depending on the classifier and using a combination of lexical and syntactic features in the background.
机译:尽管存在识别is_a或part_of之类的定义良好的关系的方法,但是现有工具很少支持想要定义新的特定于域的关系的用户。我们在植物科学中进行了一个案例研究,并介绍了四个新的领域特定关系,这是领域科学家感兴趣的,但是在信息科学中尚未进行探索。结果表明,关系之间的精度有所不同,制造商位置类别的精度介于0.73至0.91之间,种子供体-库关系的精度介于0.89和0.93之间,种子起源位置的精度介于0.29和0.67之间,田间实验位置的精度介于0.32和0.77之间。制造商位置类别的召回范围从0.91到0.94,种子库-供体位置的召回范围在0.93和1之间,种子来源关系从0.33到0.82,而田间试验位置在0.67到0.83之间,这取决于分类器并结合使用背景中的词汇和句法特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号