【24h】

COST OF GEOTHERMAL POWER AND FACTORS THAT AFFECT IT

机译:地热能的成本及其影响因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents an analysis of the sensitivity of the cost of geothermal power to: (a) capital cost; (b) operations-and-maintenance (O&M) cost; (c) make-up well drilling cost; (d) resource characteristics (well productivity and its rate of decline); (e) development and operational options (installed plant capacity, number of years of make-up well drilling, and project life); and (f) macro-economic climate (interest and inflation rates). The power cost here represents levelized cost (in cents per kilowatt-hour) over the project life, the capital cost being amortized over 30 years; any royalties, tax burden, or tax credit are ignored. A range of development sizes, from 5 to 150 MW, is considered. The economy of scale in both capital cost and O&M cost, as well as the higher productivity decline rate due to increased installed capacity, are taken into account. Power cost is sharply reduced by maintaining full generation capacity, by drilling make-up wells, for at least the first 10 years or so following plant start-up; however, continuing make-up well drilling beyond about 20 years up does not reduce power cost any further. The minimum achievable power cost is insensitive to plant capacity; it is on the order of 3.40 / kWh. There are significant opportunities to reduce power cost as site-specific experience is gained in resource management and power plant operation throughout the project life. Power cost is most sensitive to unit O&M cost followed by unit capital cost, interest rate and inflation rate in the decreasing order of sensitivity; it is relatively insensitive to well productivity, drilling cost per well or well productivity decline rate. The macro-economic environment has relatively minor impact on power cost. Operating small power plants beyond their typical amortization period of 30 years can substantially reduce power cost; this reduction is insignificant for plants of 50 MW or larger capacity. Power cost does not decline significantly with increasing plant capacity except in the unlikely situation of well productivity decline being insensitive to plant capacity, when it may be as low as 3.20 / kWh. In the unusual situation of an absence of economy of scale, power cost increases with plant capacity, the minimum achievable level being 3.40 / kWh. In the very unlikely situation of both well productivity decline as well as unit capital and O&M costs being insensitive to plant capacity, power cost would be on the order of 3.60 / kWh.
机译:本文对地热发电成本对以下方面的敏感性进行了分析:(a)资本成本; (b)运营和维护(O&M)成本; (c)补给井的钻井成本; (d)资源特征(井生产率及其下降率); (e)开发和操作方案(工厂的装机容量,补充钻井的年限和项目寿命); (f)宏观经济环境(利率和通货膨胀率)。此处的电力成本表示项目生命周期内的平均成本(以每千瓦时分为单位),资本成本分30年摊销;任何特许权使用费,税收负担或税收抵免都将被忽略。考虑的开发规模范围为5到150 MW。考虑了资本成本和运维成本的规模经济,以及由于装机容量增加而导致的生产率下降率较高。通过在工厂启动后至少头十年左右的时间内保持补给能力,并通过钻补水井,可大幅降低电力成本;但是,连续补给井钻探超过20年以上并不会进一步降低电力成本。可达到的最低电力成本对工厂容量不敏感。大约为3.40 / kWh。在整个项目生命周期中,由于在资源管理和电厂运营方面获得了特定于站点的经验,因此存在大量降低电力成本的机会。电力成本对单位运维成本最敏感,其次是单位资本成本,利率和通货膨胀率,按敏感性从高到低的顺序排列;它对油井生产率,每口井的钻井成本或油井生产率下降率相对不敏感。宏观经济环境对电力成本的影响相对较小。经营小型发电厂超过其通常的30年摊销期可大大降低电力成本;对于50兆瓦或更大容量的电厂而言,这种减少是微不足道的。电力成本不会随着工厂容量的增加而显着下降,除非在不太可能的情况下,生产率下降对工厂容量不敏感(这种情况可能低至3.20 / kWh)。在没有规模经济的特殊情况下,电力成本会随着工厂容量的增加而增加,最低可达到的水平为3.40 / kWh。在极不可能的情况下,生产率下降以及单位资本和运维成本对工厂容量不敏感,电力成本约为3.60 / kWh。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号