首页> 外文学位 >Geothermal power, policy, and design: Using levelized cost of energy and sensitivity analysis to target improved policy incentives for the U.S. geothermal market.
【24h】

Geothermal power, policy, and design: Using levelized cost of energy and sensitivity analysis to target improved policy incentives for the U.S. geothermal market.

机译:地热能,政策和设计:使用均衡的能源成本和敏感性分析来针对美国地热市场制定改进的政策激励措施。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At the core of the geothermal industry is a need to identify how policy incentives can better be applied for optimal return. Literature from Bloomquist (1999), Doris et al. (2009), and McIlveen (2011) suggest that a more tailored approach to crafting geothermal policy is warranted. In this research the guiding theory is based on those suggestions and is structured to represent a policy analysis approach using analytical methods. The methods being used are focus on qualitative and quantitative results. To address the qualitative sections of this research an extensive review of contemporary literature is used to identify the frequency of use for specific barriers, and is followed upon with an industry survey to determine existing gaps. As a result there is support for certain barriers and justification for expanding those barriers found within the literature. This method of inquiry is an initial point for structuring modeling tools to further quantify the research results as part of the theoretical framework. Analytical modeling utilizes the levelized cost of energy as a foundation for comparative assessment of policy incentives. Model parameters use assumptions to draw conclusions from literature and survey results to reflect unique attributes held by geothermal power technologies. Further testing by policy option provides an opportunity to assess the sensitivity of each variable with respect to applied policy. Master limited partnerships, feed in tariffs, RD&D;, and categorical exclusions all result as viable options for mitigating specific barriers associated to developing geothermal power. The results show reductions of levelized cost based upon the model's exclusive parameters. These results are also compared to contemporary policy options highlighting the need for tailored policy, as discussed by Bloomquist (1999), Doris et al. (2009), and McIlveen (2011). It is the intent of this research to provide the reader with a descriptive understanding of the role of geothermal power in the United States, and to recognize that not all policy or energy technology is created equal. Further study options are provide to expand the scope and granularity of this research design to better support a growing market.
机译:地热工业的核心是确定如何更好地应用政策激励措施以获得最佳回报。文献来自Bloomquist(1999),Doris等。 (2009年)和McIlveen(2011年)提出,有必要采用更加量身定制的方法来制定地热政策。在本研究中,指导理论基于这些建议,并被构造为代表使用分析方法的政策分析方法。使用的方法侧重于定性和定量结果。为了解决本研究的定性部分,对当代文献进行了广泛的回顾,以确定特定障碍的使用频率,随后进行了行业调查,以确定存在的差距。结果,人们支持某些障碍,并有理由扩大文献中发现的那些障碍。这种查询方法是构建建模工具以进一步量化研究结果(作为理论框架的一部分)的起点。分析模型利用能源的平均成本作为对政策激励措施进行比较评估的基础。模型参数使用假设从文献和调查结果中得出结论,以反映地热发电技术拥有的独特属性。通过策略选项进行进一步测试提供了一个机会,可以评估每个变量相对于应用策略的敏感性。掌握有限的合作伙伴关系,提供电价,RD&D;以及绝对排除,都是减轻与发展地热发电相关的特定障碍的可行选择。结果表明,基于模型的专有参数,可以降低平均成本。这些结果也与布鲁姆奎斯特(Bloomquist,1999年),多里斯(Doris)等人讨论的,强调定制政策的当代政策选择进行了比较。 (2009)和McIlveen(2011)。这项研究的目的是为读者提供对地热发电在美国的作用的描述性理解,并认识到并非所有政策或能源技术都是平等的。提供了进一步的研究选择,以扩展此研究设计的范围和粒度,以更好地支持不断增长的市场。

著录项

  • 作者

    Richard, Christopher L.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Delaware.;

  • 授予单位 University of Delaware.;
  • 学科 Sociology Public and Social Welfare.;Economics General.;Energy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号