首页> 外文会议>Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology; 20030520-20030522; Berlin; DE >DIFFERENT SIMULATIONS OF THE PHASE 2 OF THE OECD/NRC BWR TURBINE TRIP BENCHMARK WITH THE CODE DYN3D
【24h】

DIFFERENT SIMULATIONS OF THE PHASE 2 OF THE OECD/NRC BWR TURBINE TRIP BENCHMARK WITH THE CODE DYN3D

机译:使用代码DYN3D对OECD / NRC BWR汽轮机基准测试第二阶段的不同模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The phase 2 of the OECD/NRC BWR TT Benchmark was analysed with the core model DYN3D by using the specified core thermal-hydraulic boundary conditions. The results of the standard case that includes the consideration of one thermal-hydraulic channel per assembly, the ADF and the standard phase slip model of DYN3D show a good agreement with measured values as the radial averaged power distribution and the total power versus time. The influence of the ADF is small, if these core-averaged values are compared. Differences in the results of single fuel assemblies were observed. If the core is described by only 33 thermal-hydraulic channels, it is observed too. The ZUBER-FINDLAY slip model shows only small deviations to the standard model of MOLOCHNIKOV. The one-dimensional model also describes the average core values in good agreement with the standard model. If the transient is calculated by the coupled code system, the core behaviour is strongly influenced by the interaction of the thermal hydraulics of the core with the remainder of the system. Nevertheless the neutron kinetics and thermal hydraulics of the reactor core should be described as detailed as possible. This is important in the case that local and/or extreme values are considered. If a fast-running one-dimensional model is applied, the one-dimensional cross section sets have to be elaborated by radial condensing. However, due to the fast computers nowadays available the man power needed for generating the one-dimensional cross section library can be saved by applying three-dimensional core models.
机译:使用指定的岩心热工水力边界条件,使用岩心模型DYN3D分析了OECD / NRC BWR TT基准测试的第二阶段。标准情况的结果包括考虑每个组件一个热工液压通道,ADF和DYN3D的标准相移模型,与径向平均功率分布以及总功率随时间变化的测量值显示出良好的一致性。如果将这些核心平均值进行比较,则ADF的影响很小。观察到单个燃料组件结果的差异。如果仅用33个热工液压通道描述岩心,那么也可以观察到它。 ZUBER-FINDLAY滑动模型仅显示与MOLOCHNIKOV标准模型的很小偏差。一维模型还描述了与标准模型完全一致的平均核心值。如果瞬变是由耦合代码系统计算的,则磁芯的性能会受到磁芯热液压与系统其余部分相互作用的强烈影响。然而,应尽可能详细地描述反应堆堆芯的中子动力学和热力学。在考虑局部和/或极值的情况下,这一点很重要。如果应用了快速运行的一维模型,则必须通过径向压缩来完善一维横截面集。但是,由于当今计算机的快速可用,可以通过应用三维核心模型来节省生成一维截面库所需的人力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号