首页> 外文会议>Annual Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar(CASS); 20040427-29; Tucson,AZ(US) >Human Factors Evaluation of Vertical Situational Awareness: Altimetry Errors
【24h】

Human Factors Evaluation of Vertical Situational Awareness: Altimetry Errors

机译:纵向情景意识的人为因素评估:测高误差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the human factors issues related to the display of Geometric Altitude on the Terrain Awareness Display (TAD) of the Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS). Geometric Altitude is essentially a measure of the aircraft's True Altitude, the vertical distance above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The purpose of the display of Geometric Altitude is to indicate to the flight crew the reference altitude employed for the TAD and the Forward-Looking Terrain Avoidance Alerts. Geometric Altitude is not intended for vertical navigation. The investigation focused on the evaluation of: the independent effects of presenting a digital read-out of Geometric Altitude on the TAD; and the reference altitude employed for the depiction of terrain on the TAD (Geometric Vs Barometric Altitude). A part-task simulation facility (PC based) was employed for the evaluation. Thirty evaluation pilots were subjected to a range of conditions. The data indicate that: 1. an EGPWS that employs Geometric Altitude as the reference altitude for the terrain display and predictive alerting functions leads to an earlier and improved detection rate of an altitude deviation resulting from altimetry-related anomalies; 2. the addition of a digital read-out of Geometric Altitude on the terrain display leads to an earlier and improved detection rate of an altitude deviation resulting from altimetry-related anomalies; 3. Geometric Altitude resulted in better and more consistent pilot decision-making following the detection of an altitude anomaly — the display of Geometric Altitude does not negatively impact pilot decision making; and 4. pilot acceptability of an EGPWS employing Geometric Altitude as the reference system altitude and its display on the TAD is high. Subjects did not consider the display of Geometric Altitude to impose unrealistic mental workload demands. The data from this investigation provides evidence that display of Geometric Altitude in the flight deck would lead to improvements in operational safety.
机译:这项调查的目的是评估与在增强型近地警告系统(EGPWS)的地形意识显示(TAD)上显示几何高度有关的人为因素问题。几何高度本质上是对飞机真实高度(即平均海平面(MSL)上方的垂直距离)的度量。显示几何高度的目的是向飞行机组指示TAD和前瞻性地形回避警报所采用的参考高度。几何高度不适用于垂直导航。该调查的重点是以下方面的评估:在TAD上呈现几何高度的数字读数的独立效果;以及在TAD上用于描述地形的参考高度(几何与气压高度)。零件任务模拟工具(基于PC)用于评估。 30名评估飞行员经受了一系列条件的考验。数据表明:1.使用几何高度作为地形显示的参考高度的EGPWS,并且具有预警功能,这导致了与测高相关异常引起的高度偏差的更早和更高的检测率; 2.在地形显示屏上增加“几何高度”的数字读数,可以更早地提高由测高相关异常引起的高度偏差的检测率; 3.在检测到高度异常之后,“几何高度”导致更好和更一致的飞行员决策。“几何高度”的显示不会对飞行员的决策产生负面影响; 4.使用几何高度作为参考系统高度的EGPWS的飞行员可接受性,其在TAD上的显示很高。受试者没有考虑几何高度的显示来施加不切实际的心理工作量要求。该调查的数据提供了证据,在驾驶舱中显示几何高度会改善操作安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号