首页> 外文会议>Americas Conference on Information Systems(AMCIS 2007); 20070810-12; Keystone,CO(US) >Differences in Contracting: Anchoring Formal and Relational Norms within BPO Governance
【24h】

Differences in Contracting: Anchoring Formal and Relational Norms within BPO Governance

机译:订约方面的差异:在BPO治理中固定形式和关系规范

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Within IS outsourcing research there is an ongoing discussion whether formal contracts and relational norms function as substitutes or as complements to each other. However, even those deals which are based on relational norms usually comprise a contract as their foundation. We therefore aim at analyzing differences in contracting between both governance modes (i.e. contract-based or based on relational norms) and exploring their impact on outsourcing satisfaction. Based on a survey with 335 Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) deals in the German banking industry we show that clauses on problem resolution are most important in BPO contract design. Furthermore, we find that deals focusing on formal governance put a lot of emphasis on the design of Service Level Agreements (SLAs) whereas deals focusing on relational governance pay special attention to the unambiguousness of outsourcing objectives.
机译:在IS外包研究中,正在进行中的讨论是正式合同和关系规范是相互替代还是互补。但是,即使那些基于关系规范的交易也通常以合同为基础。因此,我们旨在分析两种治理模式(即基于合同或基于关系规范)之间的合同差异,并探讨它们对外包满意度的影响。根据对德国银行业中335个业务流程外包(BPO)交易的调查,我们表明,解决问题的条款在BPO合同设计中最重要。此外,我们发现以正式治理为重点的交易大量强调了服务水平协议(SLA)的设计,而以关系治理为重点的交易则特别关注了外包目标的明确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号