首页> 外文会议>American Control Conference;ACC >Comparison of SDRE and SMC control approaches for flutter suppression in a nonlinear wing section
【24h】

Comparison of SDRE and SMC control approaches for flutter suppression in a nonlinear wing section

机译:SDRE和SMC控制方法在非线性机翼部分抑制颤动的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The effect of flutter phenomenon on dynamic stability of aeroelastic systems is a main interest of recent studies. Among many approaches for suppression of flutter, in this paper two control strategies are introduced and their results are compared. State-Dependent Riccati Equation (SDRE) approach and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) approach are used for stabilization of an Aeroservoelastic system with structural nonlinearities at subsonic flight speed regime. These two control techniques suppress flutter as well as reduce the vibration level in sub-critical and post-flutter speeds. The developed aeroservoelastic model describes the pitch and plunge motion of a wing section associated with a single control surface. For state-space representation of the model, the measured pitch angle, plunge displacement and their derivatives are allocated as state vector, and control surface deflection as input command. For a given initial state conditions, two modes of open loop and closed loop control system are simulated. It is shown that, with a nonlinear structure in subsonic regime, the open loop system is unstable and Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCOs) are generated. However, the closed loop system is asymptotically stable and converges to the origin. Therefore, the proposed approaches have a good performance on suppressing flutter and LCOs. However, comparing between the two approaches shows that SMC method requires larger control input, as well as a shorter time response with respect to SDRE method.
机译:颤振现象对气动弹性系统动力稳定性的影响是最近研究的主要兴趣。在许多抑制颤动的方法中,本文介绍了两种控制策略,并比较了它们的结果。基于状态的里卡蒂方程(SDRE)方法和滑模控制(SMC)方法用于稳定具有亚音速飞行速度结构非线性的航空弹性系统。这两种控制技术可抑制颤动,并降低亚临界和后颤振速度下的振动水平。所开发的航空弹性模型描述了与单个控制面相关的机翼部分的俯仰和俯冲运动。对于模型的状态空间表示,将测得的俯仰角,推入位移及其导数分配为状态向量,并将控制面挠度作为输入命令。对于给定的初始状态条件,模拟了开环和闭环控制系统的两种模式。结果表明,在亚音速状态下具有非线性结构的开环系统是不稳定的,并且会产生极限循环振荡(LCO)。但是,闭环系统是渐近稳定的,并且收敛到原点。因此,所提出的方法在抑制颤动和LCO方面具有良好的性能。但是,两种方法之间的比较表明,SMC方法需要较大的控制输入,并且相对于SDRE方法需要更短的时间响应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Control Conference;ACC》|2012年|p.6148- 6153|共6页
  • 会议地点 Montreal(CA)
  • 作者

    Elhami, M. R.;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Mechanical Engineering Imam Hossein University;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号