首页> 外文会议>Advances in cryptology-Eurocrypt'98 >Finding Collisions on a One-Way Street: Can Secure Hash Functions Be Based on General Assumptions?
【24h】

Finding Collisions on a One-Way Street: Can Secure Hash Functions Be Based on General Assumptions?

机译:在单向街道上查找冲突:安全哈希函数可以基于一般假设吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We prove the existance of an oracle relative to which there exist several well-known cryptographic primitives, including one-way permutations, but excluding (for a suitably strong definition) collision-intractible hash functions. Thus any proof that such functions can be derived from these weaker primitives is necessarily non-relativizing; in particular, no provable construction of a collision-intractable hash function can exist based solely on a "black box" one-way permutation. This result can be viewed as a partial justification for the common practice of treating the collision-intractable hash function as a cryptographic primitive, rather than attempting to derive it from a weaker primitive (such as a one-way permutation).
机译:我们证明了存在一个预言器,相对于该预言器存在几个众所周知的密码原语,包括单向排列,但不包括(对于适当的强定义)冲突难处理的哈希函数。因此,任何可以从这些较弱的原语派生出此类功能的证据都必定是非相对论的。特别地,不能仅基于“黑匣子”单向置换来存在可证明冲突的哈希函数的可构造。对于将冲突难处理的哈希函数视为密码基元的常规做法,而不是尝试从较弱的基元(如单向置换)中推导此结果,可以将这一结果视为部分合理性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号