首页> 外文会议>A safer space for a safer world >NEW SAFETY MODEL FOR THE COMMERCIAL HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT INDUSTRY
【24h】

NEW SAFETY MODEL FOR THE COMMERCIAL HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT INDUSTRY

机译:商业载人航天业的新安全模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The aviation and space domains have safetyrnguidelines and recommended practices for DesignrnOrganisations (DOs) and Operators alike. In terms ofrnAerospace DOs there are certification criteria to meetrnand to demonstrate compliance there are AdvisoryrnCirculars or Acceptable Means of Compliance tornfollow. Additionally there are guidelines such asrnAerospace Recommended Practices (ARP), MilitaryrnStandards (MIL-STD 882 series) and System SafetyrnHandbooks to follow in order to identify and managernfailure conditions. In terms of Operators there arernFAA guidelines and a useful ARP that details manyrntools and techniques in understanding Operator SafetyrnRisks. However there is currently no methodology forrnlinking the DO and Operator safety efforts. In thernspace domain NASA have provided safety standardsrnand guidelines to follow and also within Europe therernare European Co-operation of Space Standardizationrn(ECSS) to follow. Within the emerging CommercialrnHuman Spaceflight Industry, the FAA’s Office ofrnCommercial Space Transportation has providedrnhazard analysis guidelines. However all of these spacerndomain safety documents are based on the existingrnaerospace methodology and once again, there is nornlink between the DO and Operator’s safety effort.rnThis paper addresses the problematic issue andrnpresents a coherent methodology of joining up thernSystem Safety effort of the DOs to the OperatorrnSafety Risk Management such that a ‘Total System’rnapproach is adopted. Part of the rationale is that therncorrect mitigation (control) can be applied within therncorrect place in the accident sequence. Also thisrncontiguous approach ensures that the Operator is fullyrnaware of the safety risks (at the accident level) andrntherefore has an appreciation of the Total SystemrnRisk.rnThe authors of this paper contend that it is betterrnpractice to have a fully integrated safety model asrnopposed to disparate requirements or guidelines. Ourrnmethodology is firstly to review ‘best practice’rnapproaches from the aviation and space industries, andrnthen to integrate these approaches into a contiguousrnsafety model for the commercial human spaceflightrnindustry.
机译:航空和航天领域对于设计组织(DO)和运营人都有安全指南和推荐做法。就航空航天DO而言,有满足的认证标准,并且为了证明合规性,有遵循的咨询通告或可接受的合规手段。此外,还有一些指南,例如《航空航天推荐做法》(ARP),《军事标准》(MIL-STD 882系列)和《系统安全手册》,以识别和管理故障情况。就运营人而言,有FAA指南和有用的ARP,其中详细介绍了了解运营人安全风险的许多工具和技术。但是,目前还没有方法可以将DO和操作员的安全工作联系在一起。在太空领域,美国国家航空航天局(NASA)提供了安全标准和要遵循的指南,在欧洲,欧洲空间标准化组织(ECSS)也要遵循。在新兴的人类太空飞行产业中,FAA商业太空运输办公室提供了危害分析指南。但是,所有这些间隔域安全文档都是基于现有的航空航天方法,再一次,DO和运营商的安全工作之间没有联系。rn本文解决了这个问题,并提出了将DO的系统安全工作与运营商安全相结合的一致方法。风险管理,以采用“总体系统”方法。部分原因是可以在事故序列的正确位置内应用正确的缓解措施(控制措施)。同样,这种连续的方法还可以确保操作员对事故风险方面的安全风险一无所知,因此对总体系统风险有所了解。本文的作者认为,将完全集成的安全模型与不同的要求或要求相提并论是一种更好的做法。准则。我们的方法首先是回顾航空和航天工业的“最佳实践”方法,然后将这些方法整合到用于商业载人航天的连续安全模型中。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Versailles(FR)
  • 作者单位

    Saturn SMS, 1 Newton St Loe, Bath, UK, BA2 9BR, E-mail: andyquinn@saturnsms.com;

    City University, London, UK, E-mail:S.J.Bond@city.ac.uk;

    University of Bath, UK, E-mail: P.G.Maropoulos@bath.ac.uk;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号