【24h】

Dynamic Routing Protocol Performance in a Fault-Tolerant Ethernet-based IP Network

机译:基于容错以太网的IP网络中的动态路由协议性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Using a hybrid star-ring shaped Ethernet network with a fault-tolerant reconfigureable Ethernet proxy (FREP), we experimentally evaluated the performance of the RIP, OSPF, and EIGRP dynamic routing protocols. The protocols were analyzed in their ability to provide fast convergence rates in the FREP environment with a minimum trade-off in CPU utilization and network overhead. Our results show that all three protocols can be finely tuned to provide the desired convergence rates and are well suited for operation in a simple ring-shaped Ethernet-based network. RIP is well-suited for this application due its inherent support of routing loops. It's main drawback is the broadcasting of ~1kB packets at the specified update interval. OSPF and EIGRP also performed well with their main disadvantage being configuration complexity and increased CPU overhead. These two protocols, however, possess additional advanced features that allow them to scale well into larger and more complex networks. Convergence rates as low as 3.3 sec. were achieved with all three routing protocols as opposed to an average of 40 sec. using each protocol's default settings.
机译:使用具有容错可重配置以太网代理(FREP)的混合星形环形以太网,我们通过实验评估了RIP,OSPF和EIGRP动态路由协议的性能。分析了协议在FREP环境中提供快速收敛速率的能力,同时在CPU利用率和网络开销方面取得了最小的折衷。我们的结果表明,可以对所有这三种协议进行微调以提供所需的收敛速率,并且非常适合在基于环形环形以太网的简单网络中运行。 RIP固有地支持路由循环,因此非常适合此应用程序。它的主要缺点是在指定的更新间隔广播〜1kB数据包。 OSPF和EIGRP也表现良好,其主要缺点是配置复杂性和增加的CPU开销。但是,这两个协议具有其他高级功能,可以使它们很好地扩展到更大,更复杂的网络中。收敛速度低至3.3秒。三种路由协议均实现了这一目标,而平均时间为40秒。使用每个协议的默认设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号