【24h】

Analysis of the Difference of Gaussians Model in Image Difference Metrics

机译:图像差异度量中高斯模型差异的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The goal of this work is to present and review two new image difference metrics, named S_(DOG) - CIELAB and S_(DOG) - DEE. These metrics are along the same lines as the standard S-CIELAB metric (Zhang and Wandell, 1997), modified to include a pyramidal subsampling, the Difference of Gaussians receptive-field model (DOG) (Tadmor and Tolhurst, 2000), and the ΔE_E color-difference formula (Oleari et al, 2009). The DOG model and the AEe formula have been shown to improve respectively contrast measures and image quality metrics (Simone et al., 2009). Extensive testing using 29 state-of-the-art metrics and six image databases has been performed. Although this new approach is promising, we only find weak evidence of effectiveness. Analysis of the results indicates that the metrics show fairly good correlations over particular test images, yet they do not outperform the most common objective quality measures.
机译:这项工作的目的是提出并审查两个新的图像差异度量,分别称为S_(DOG)-CIELAB和S_(DOG)-DEE。这些指标与标准S-CIELAB指标(Zhang and Wandell,1997)相同,经过修改以包括金字塔二次抽样,高斯接收场差模型(DOG)(Tadmor和Tolhurst,2000),以及ΔE_E色差公式(Oleari等,2009)。已经证明,DOG模型和AEe公式分别改善了对比度测量和图像质量指标(Simone等,2009)。使用29个最新指标和六个图像数据库进行了广泛的测试。尽管这种新方法很有希望,但我们仅能找到有效证据。对结果的分析表明,这些指标在特定的测试图像上显示出相当好的相关性,但它们的性能并没有优于最常见的客观质量指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号