【24h】

THE POSSIBILITIES OF MAPPING NATURAL SYSTEMS INTO ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS - PART 1

机译:将自然系统映射到组织系统中的可能性-第1部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The presented 1st part of the paper is based on a four-year-long research on two categories of living systems: natural systems and organizational systems. Natural systems - as a part of biological world - were defined as a set of living organisms and interrelations between them, organizational systems - as a part of human system - as a set of organizations and interrelations between them. The main idea which inclined the author to the research was the assumption that organizational systems became more and more complex on one side but on the other reveal lots of weaknesses as the whole (general example: the paradoxes of globalization). One of the nature focused futurist, K. Kelly, said that organizations are starting to take on the complexity of natural systems and at that point they become out of our control. The natural thinking is: if we want to understand the complexity of organizational system and be able to steer it, we need to understand natural systems first. They might be a great model of what organizational systems or even the whole human system is starting to be. Through the comparison of both systems we might come to final ideas of what to concentrate on. The strategic point would be the ability to model organizational and human system according to natural determination of systems construction. Nature was always inspiring for humans, but usually in its specific parts. This research was a general and wide system analysis of the construction of nature as a whole in the context of mapping its solutions into organizational and human world. This paper, as part 1 of the research, is concentrated on: methodological aspects of mapping process of two categories of systems, description of natural and organizational systems. Finally it presents the main outcome which is the facet for both system analysis. The facet is four dimensional, according to function, structure, process and context of each system in their four levels of emergent properties. It shows the construction of natural and organizational world and makes the simple basis for further research and analysis.
机译:本文提出的第一部分基于对生命系统的两类进行了长达四年的研究:自然系统和组织系统。自然系统-作为生物世界的一部分-被定义为一组活的生物及其之间的相互关系,组织系统-作为人类系统的一部分-被定义为一组组织及其之间的相互关系。使作者倾向于研究的主要思想是这样一个假设,即组织系统一方面变得越来越复杂,但另一方面却揭示了整体上的许多弱点(一般示例:全球化的悖论)。一位以自然为中心的未来学家K. Kelly说,组织开始承担自然系统的复杂性,到那时,它们已变得不受我们的控制。自然的想法是:如果我们想了解组织系统的复杂性并能够驾驭它,我们需要首先了解自然系统。它们可能是组织系统乃至整个人类系统开始成为一个很好的模型。通过两个系统的比较,我们可能会得出关于集中精力的最终想法。战略要点是能够根据系统构建的自然确定性对组织系统和人员系统进行建模的能力。大自然总是在鼓舞着人类,但通常是在特定的部分。这项研究是在将自然界的解决方案映射到组织和人类世界的背景下,对整体自然界进行的一般性和广泛系统分析。作为研究的第1部分,本文着重于:两类系统的映射过程的方法论方面,自然系统和组织系统的描述。最后,它给出了两个系统分析的主要结果。根据每个系统在四个级别的紧急属性中的功能,结构,过程和上下文,该方面是四个维度。它显示了自然和组织世界的构建,并为进一步的研究和分析提供了简单的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号