首页> 外文会议>The 4th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Jul, 2000, Amsterdam >An Accuracy Comparison of Six Spatial Interpolation Methods for Modelling Forest Stand Structure on the Fraser Experimental Forest, Colorado
【24h】

An Accuracy Comparison of Six Spatial Interpolation Methods for Modelling Forest Stand Structure on the Fraser Experimental Forest, Colorado

机译:六种空间插值方法在科罗拉多州弗雷泽实验森林上模拟林分结构的精度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study compared four geostatistical methods of interpolation (ordinary kriging, universal kriging, cokriging, and disjunctive kriging) with two traditional estimation methods (polygon mapping, and inverse distance weighting). The six techniques were used to spatially interpolate the number of stems, basal area, and number of seedlings on 82 plots in a 121-hectare first-order forest watershed at the USDA Forest Service, Fraser Experimental Forest, Fraser, Colorado, USA. Secondary variables used for cokriging included elevation, a combined value for slope and aspect, and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from Landsat-TM satellite imagery. The comparison criterion was the mean square error (MSE) calculated by cross validation. The performance of the estimation techniques was different between variables. Overall, however, cokriging performed the best, followed by polygonal mapping. Universal kriging with a first or second degree trend surface yielded, in general, better results than ordinary kriging. Inverse distance weighting was generally outperformed by the linear kriging methods. The nonlinear kriging method (disjunctive kriging) performed least well. These results indicate that the additional accuracy from spatially cross-correlated variables substantially improves the estimation capability of cokriging, as compared to the other methods for these data.
机译:这项研究比较了四种插值地统计方法(普通克里金法,通用克里金法,共克里金法和析取克里金法)与两种传统估计方法(多边形映射和反距离权重)。在美国科罗拉多州弗雷泽的弗雷泽实验森林的美国农业部森林服务局的121公顷一级森林流域的82块土地上,使用这六种技术对82块地的茎,基部面积和幼苗数量进行空间插值。用于cokriging的次要变量包括海拔,坡度和坡度的组合值以及Landsat-TM卫星影像的归一化植被指数(NDVI)。比较标准是通过交叉验证计算的均方误差(MSE)。变量之间估计技术的性能有所不同。总体而言,cokriging表现最好,其次是多边形映射。通常,具有一阶或二阶趋势面的通用克里金法比普通克里金法产生更好的结果。线性距离克里金法通常比反距离加权更好。非线性克里金法(分离克里金法)表现最差。这些结果表明,与用于这些数据的其他方法相比,来自空间互相关变量的附加准确性大大提高了协同克里格法的估计能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号