首页> 外文会议>4th International Pipeline Conference, Sep 30-Oct 3, 2002, Calgary >RISK ASSESSMENT STUDIES OF GASKETED AND NON-GASKETED BOLTED PIPE JOINTS
【24h】

RISK ASSESSMENT STUDIES OF GASKETED AND NON-GASKETED BOLTED PIPE JOINTS

机译:缩孔和未缩孔螺栓连接接头的风险评估研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over many years much effort has been made to develop design codes for pressure vessels, pipe-work, flanges and so on to design a system of high structural integrity. In-spite of the efforts the reliability of the system can be adversely affected for many reasons. Poor construction practices, incorrect selection of components such as gasket, improper quality of bolts and surface treatment, incorrect tooling, wrong application, underestimated joint size due to incorrect loading consideration, incorrect use of code, lack of thought to plant use, or a change of use during the life of a plant may make a joint unsuitable. The list is not exhaustive and not all the possible causes of failure may become apparent during commissioning. Failure of a pipe joint means the achievement of a leak rate below a certain maximum limit or the gross failure of the pipeline in which structural integrity is lost. So the high reliability of a system can be obtained if the right joint is selected for an application and factors that affect the reliability should be considered carefully. A very limited work has been done for the risk assessment of bolted pipe joints. At first, the most comprehensive work is done by Det Norske Veritas (DNV) regarding risk assessment of pipe joints. In addition, Webjorn and Thompson have also performed comparative reliability studies for these joints. Both DNV and Webjorn concluded that compact flange joints show better functional safety than conventional gasketed flange joints. Thomson concluded that both the joints are of high integrity and perform well in excellent service under appropriate installation and maintenance conditions. All above studies have been performed based on information and observations. Present author has performed detailed failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in the light of above-mentioned studies, idustrial surveys, analysis, experimental work and subsequent observations. The aim of the study was to increase the reliability knowledge about the gasketed and non-gasketed flanged pipe joints and thereby to increase the basis for finding the optimal pipe connection based on general observation and experimental studies performed.
机译:多年来,为开发压力容器,管道工程,法兰等的设计规范付出了很多努力,以设计具有高度结构完整性的系统。尽管付出了很多努力,但由于许多原因,系统的可靠性仍可能受到不利影响。不良的施工实践,错误选择垫片等组件,螺栓和表面处理的质量不正确,工具不正确,应用错误,由于不正确的载荷考虑而导致接头尺寸被低估,错误使用代码,缺乏对工厂使用的想法或变更在植物的生命周期内使用可能会导致关节不适。该列表并不详尽,并且在调试过程中并非所有可能的故障原因都显而易见。管接头的故障是指达到某个最大极限以下的泄漏率,或者是丧失了结构完整性的管道的严重故障。因此,如果为应用选择了正确的接头,并且可以仔细考虑影响可靠性的因素,则可以获得系统的高可靠性。螺栓管接头的风险评估工作非常有限。首先,Det Norske Veritas(DNV)在管道接头的风险评估方面完成了最全面的工作。此外,Webjorn和Thompson还对这些接头进行了比较可靠性研究。 DNV和Webjorn均得出结论,紧凑型法兰接头比传统的垫片式法兰接头具有更好的功能安全性。汤姆森得出的结论是,两个接头都具有很高的完整性,并且在适当的安装和维护条件下,在出色的服务中表现良好。以上所有研究都是基于信息和观察进行的。本作者根据上述研究,工业调查,分析,实验工作和后续观察,进行了详细的失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)。该研究的目的是增加有关带垫片和不带垫片的法兰管接头的可靠性知识,从而增加基于一般观察和进行的实验研究找到最佳管接头的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号