首页> 外文会议>46th Annual Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar (CASS 2001) ― A Safety Odyssey (Humans, Machines and Technology), Apr 24-26, 2001, Orlando, Florida, U.S. >In-flight Oxygen: An Increasing Safety Risk- Flight Safety Foundation Corporate Advisory Committee Oxygen Working Group Report
【24h】

In-flight Oxygen: An Increasing Safety Risk- Flight Safety Foundation Corporate Advisory Committee Oxygen Working Group Report

机译:机上氧气:不断增加的安全风险-飞行安全基金会公司咨询委员会氧气工作组报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two recent aviation accidents have raised public awareness about aircraft oxygen systems. The ValuJet Flight 592 accident in the Florida Everglades on May 11, 1996, in which all 110 people aboard were killed, highlighted the dangers of transporting oxygen devices aboard passenger aircraft. The Payne Stewart Learjet 35 accident in South Dakota on October 25, 1999, intensified concerns about aircraft life-support systems. Both of these accidents rekindled a number of key questions regarding an appreciation of the hostile environment inherent in air travel. With the advances in aircraft technology and construction over the past 50 years, we seem to have become somewhat complacent in our regard for the precariousness of high-altitude air travel. Indeed, during flight the crew and passengers are encapsulated inside a vessel with a skin measured in millimeters, soaring through air that contains insufficient oxygen for survival. Any breech of that aluminum and Plexiglas skin could be catastrophic. Yet, in flight we presume all the comforts and safety of our own living rooms ― including the presumption of readily available oxygen ― rarely entertaining the notion of a life-threatening accident. One of the most crucial components during any high-altitude flight is the aircraft oxygen system. Proper installation, maintenance, and training of the crewmembers in the use of the onboard oxygen system is vital to counter an oxygen-related emergency, whether that be a sudden loss of cabin pressure or caring for a passenger who has fainted. As increasingly modern and sophisticated aircraft capable of higher altitude flight and greater distances of nonstop travel become available, one must ask if current oxygen systems are sufficient in scope and the training extensive enough to counter the new propensities for in-flight emergencies.
机译:最近发生的两次航空事故已经提高了公众对飞机氧气系统的认识。 1996年5月11日,在佛罗里达大沼泽地的ValuJet 592航班事故,其中所有110人丧生,突显了在旅客飞机上运输氧气装置的危险。 1999年10月25日在南达科他州发生的Payne Stewart Learjet 35事故加剧了人们对飞机生命支持系统的担忧。这两起事故再次引发了许多关键问题,涉及对航空旅行固有的敌对环境的欣赏。随着过去50年来飞机技术和结构的进步,我们似乎对高空飞行的危险性感到有些沾沾自喜。确实,在飞行过程中,机组人员和乘客被包裹在一个以毫米为单位的皮肤内的容器中,并在空气中so翔,空气中的氧气不足以维持生命。铝和有机玻璃外壳的任何臀位都可能是灾难性的。然而,在飞行中,我们假设自己客厅的所有舒适和安全性(包括假定随时可用的氧气)很少会引起危及生命的事故。在任何高空飞行中,最关键的组件之一就是飞机的氧气系统。对机组人员在使用车载氧气系统方面进行正确的安装,维护和培训,对于应对与氧气有关的紧急情况至关重要,无论是突然失去机舱压力还是照顾晕倒的乘客。随着能够实现更高高度飞行和更大距离的不间断飞行的越来越先进和先进的飞机的出现,人们必须问当前的氧气系统的范围是否足够,训练是否足够广泛以应对飞行中紧急情况的新趋势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号