首页> 外文会议>37th International technical conference on clean coal amp; fuel systems 2012 >Process Performance of Non-aqueous Amine-based CO_2 Capture Solvents
【24h】

Process Performance of Non-aqueous Amine-based CO_2 Capture Solvents

机译:非水胺基CO_2捕集溶剂的工艺性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

ION Engineering is developing a number of novel solvents for post combustion carbon capture and has recently completed a number of studies to compare the potential advantages of these new solvents to aqueous monoethanolamine (MEA) for both in a pulverized coal-fired flue gas and natural gas combined cycle (NGCC)-fired flue gas. The comparison between ION's novel solvent and aqueous MEA shows that ION's solvent requires 21% and 29% less total regeneration energy for coal and NGCC conditions respectively. Additionally, ION solvents required 22% and 26% less net thermal energy to regenerate the solvent, coal and NGCC conditions, respectively The test runs in ION's 9 gph pilot scale absorber showed that ION's solvent absorbed 57% more CO_2 from the NGCC flue gas than an aqueous MEA when operated under similar conditions. Based on the positive outcomes of these studies, ION is currently conducting solvent tests using actual coal-fired and NGCC-fired flue gas at the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) in North Dakota with funding from both DOE/NETL and CCP3. Pending the outcome of these test campaigns, ION plans to initiate larger slipstream studies in early 2014.
机译:ION Engineering正在开发用于燃烧后碳捕集的多种新型溶剂,并且最近完成了许多研究,以比较这些新型溶剂在煤粉烟气和天然气中相对于单乙醇胺水溶液(MEA)的潜在优势。联合循环(NGCC)燃烧的烟气。 ION的新型溶剂与水性MEA的比较表明,ION的溶剂在煤和NGCC条件下所需的总再生能量分别减少21%和29%。此外,ION溶剂分别需要22%和26%的净热能来再生溶剂,煤和NGCC条件。在ION的9 gph中试规模吸收塔中进行的测试显示,ION的溶剂比NGCC烟道气吸收的CO_2多57%在类似条件下操作时,请使用水性MEA。基于这些研究的积极成果,ION目前正在DOE / NETL和CCP3的资助下,在北达科他州能源与环境研究中心(EERC)中使用实际的燃煤和NGCC烟气进行溶剂测试。在这些测试活动取得结果之前,ION计划在2014年初启动更大的补充研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号