首页> 外文会议>32nd SWANA annual landfill gas symposium 2009 >Evaluation of Green Waste Management Impacts on GHG Emissions Alternative Daily Cover Compared with Composting
【24h】

Evaluation of Green Waste Management Impacts on GHG Emissions Alternative Daily Cover Compared with Composting

机译:与堆肥相比,绿色废物管理对温室气体排放替代日覆盖的影响评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Green waste is a key component of California's solid waste stream and so is an important target for effective waste diversion. The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) reports that about 15 million cubic yards of organics comprised largely of green waste are diverted annually in California. The diverted organics are principally used as compost and mulch in agricultural and urban green areas. In California, one of the most popular alternative waste diversion options is the use of green waste as landfill alternative daily cover (ADC). Green waste ADC reduces the need for importing clean daily cover soil and so helps conserve limited landfill volume. However when landfilled, green waste can generate methane, an important greenhouse gas (GHG), and so may be regarded as environmentally inferior to green waste composting.rnThis study uses GHG emissions estimated from life-cycle inventory methodology to compare green waste ADC and composting alternatives. A United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) based life-cycle inventory methodology was developed that considers differences in transport, material handling, green waste emissions, capture and management, energy impacts, and carbon sequestration. The ADC analysis addresses the range of conditions at landfills particular to California landfills including the extent of gas recovery, the gas collection efficiency and methane energy recovery.rnThis study supports the reported benefits of composting but also shows that green waste ADC can actually be more beneficial in reducing GHG emissions when compared to the composting of green waste. This result indicates the importance of site-specific environmental analysis when considering organics management options.rnIn this study, details of the life-cycle GHG inventory analyses are provided. Results of the comparison between the two green waste management options are presented. The significance and implications of this study are discussed.
机译:绿色废物是加利福尼亚固体废物流的重要组成部分,因此是有效废物转移的重要目标。加利福尼亚综合废物管理委员会(CIWMB)报告说,加利福尼亚每年转移约1500万立方码的有机物,其中大部分是绿色废物。转移的有机物主要用作农业和城市绿地的堆肥和覆盖物。在加利福尼亚州,最流行的替代废物转移选择之一是将绿色废物用作垃圾掩埋场的替代性日常覆盖物(ADC)。绿色废物ADC减少了每天输入清洁的覆盖土壤的需求,因此有助于节省有限的垃圾填埋量。但是,在垃圾填埋场中,绿色废物会产生甲烷(一种重要的温室气体),因此在环境方面不如绿色废物堆肥。rn本研究使用生命周期清单方法估算的温室气体排放量来比较绿色废物ADC和堆肥备择方案。开发了一种基于美国环境保护局(USEPA)的生命周期清单方法,该方法考虑了运输,物料搬运,绿色废物排放,捕获和管理,能源影响以及碳固存方面的差异。 ADC分析解决了特定于加利福尼亚州垃圾填埋场的填埋条件范围,包括气体回收的程度,气体收集效率和甲烷能量的回收。rn该研究支持了堆肥的报道好处,但同时表明绿色废物ADC实际上更有益与绿色废物堆肥相比,在减少温室气体排放方面。该结果表明,在考虑有机物管理方案时,必须进行针对具体地点的环境分析。rn本研究提供了生命周期温室气体清单分析的详细信息。介绍了两种绿色废物管理方案之间的比较结果。讨论了这项研究的意义和意义。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Atlanta GA(US)
  • 作者单位

    Solid Waste Management Department Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Whittier, California;

    rnSolid Waste Management Department Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Whittier, California;

    rnSolid Waste Management Department Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Whittier, California;

    rnSolid Waste Management Department Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts Whittier, California;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 石油、天然气地质与勘探;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号