首页> 外文会议>第30届国际皮革工艺师和化学家协会联合会大会(XXX Congress of the International Union of Leather Technologists amp; Chemists Societies) >Application of the Hypothesis Analysis Method Using Cohen's Kappa Index to Measure the Agreement between Leather Sorters
【24h】

Application of the Hypothesis Analysis Method Using Cohen's Kappa Index to Measure the Agreement between Leather Sorters

机译:Cohen的Kappa指数假说分析方法在皮革分类员之间的一致性测量中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One of the more sensitive activities carried out in a tannery, because of the impact the results could cause on the customer and on the tannery's business is, certainly, the sorting or grading of the hides in the different stages (wet blue or wet white, crust and finished). The surface defects affect the aesthetics appearance of leather and leather goods as well as the usable area. If the grade assigned to a hide by a sorter is lower than the one it really is, according to the agreement with the customer it will cause economical damage to the tannery. On the other hand, if the grade assigned is higher than the one it really is, the customer will be disappointed and claim. The detection of defects on the surface of natural materials such as leather is a difficult task because of the variety of shapes and textures, as well as in the quality and quantity of defective areas. The most common method applied in the leather industry to sort or grade hides is visual inspection. Notwithstanding the sorting or grading criteria could be well defined and agreed between the tannery and the customer, we can always wonder: if we change from one sorter to another, which will be the concordance level existing between them? In other words, how far the sorters will coincide on their evaluation? Will the result be a real or random one? Due to the variability between two or more sorters which is traditionally recognized as an important source of mistakes, from our point of view, it would be very useful to transform an attribute analysis into a variable one. The tanneries that supply leather to the automotive companies have to certify their Quality System according to QS 9000 or ISO/TS 16949. One of the requirements in that norm and technical specification is to apply the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) reference Manual "Measurement Systems Analysis" which describes the study of the measurement systems by attributes. In this paper, we describe the practical way on which the agreement between sorters is measured and the application of the hypothesis analysis method, cross tabulation, calculating Kappa coefficient initially proposed by Cohen, which is a statistical concordance rating measure for qualitative (categorical items) between two sorters.
机译:在制革厂中进行的较敏感的活动之一,因为结果可能会对客户和制革厂的业务造成影响,当然是在不同阶段(湿蓝或湿白,结皮并完成)。表面缺陷影响皮革和皮革制品的美学外观以及可用区域。如果分拣员分配给生皮的等级低于其实际等级,根据与客户的协议,这将对制革厂造成经济损失。另一方面,如果指定的等级高于实际等级,则客户将感到失望并要求赔偿。由于形状和纹理的多样性以及缺陷区域的质量和数量,检测天然材料(例如皮革)表面的缺陷是一项艰巨的任务。在皮革工业中用于对生皮进行分类或分级的最常见方法是外观检查。尽管可以在制革厂和客户之间很好地定义和达成分类或分级标准,但我们总是想知道:如果我们从一种分类机更改为另一种分类机,这将是它们之间的一致性水平吗?换句话说,分拣员的评估结果将相吻合多远?结果是真实的还是随机的?由于我们通常认为两个或更多个分类器之间的差异(传统上被认为是重要的错误来源),因此将属性分析转换为可变的分析将非常有用。向汽车公司提供皮革的皮革厂必须根据QS 9000或ISO / TS 16949对其质量体系进行认证。该规范和技术规范的要求之一是应用《汽车行业行动小组(AIAG)参考手册“测量系统分析”,它按属性描述了对测量系统的研究。在本文中,我们描述了测量分类器之间一致性的实用方法,以及假设分析方法的应用,交叉制表,计算Cohen最初提出的Kappa系数,这是一种针对定性(分类项目)的统计一致性等级度量在两个分拣机之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号