首页> 外文会议>21st International congress on irrigation and drainage : Water productivity towards food security. >IRRIGATION PERFORMANCE IN COMMUNITYMANAGED SCHEMES: ASSESSMENT USING COMPARATIVE INDICATORS AND UTILITY ANALYSIS
【24h】

IRRIGATION PERFORMANCE IN COMMUNITYMANAGED SCHEMES: ASSESSMENT USING COMPARATIVE INDICATORS AND UTILITY ANALYSIS

机译:社区管理计划中的灌溉表现:使用比较指标和效用分析的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Community-managed irrigation systems are operated, managed and maintained by farmersrnthemselves. Management activities by farmers include water diversion, conveyance,rnscheduling of water delivery, maintenance of infrastructure, sanctions for misbehaving, etc.rnThese activities are in many cases carried out by institutions such as water users’ associations.rnThese schemes play significant role in addressing food security problems, particularly in leastrndeveloped nations; and in most cases they are small to medium scale schemes demandingrnlower investment and operational costs thereby serving large number of beneficiaries. Therernhave been significant investments on community-managed irrigation schemes in Ethiopia.rnThough they play a key role, these schemes suffer from poor water management and lowrnwater productivity problems.rnThis research is carried out at two community-managed irrigation schemes called Golgotarnand Wedecha located in central Ethiopia. The research aims to compare the performancernof these two schemes using external comparative indicators and to find out the internalrnmanagement practices which led to specific level of performance. Three groups ofrnbenchmarking (comparative) indicators have been used and fuzzy set concept has beenrnapplied to analyze farmers’ utility of irrigation service. Golgota scheme has a higher level of.
机译:社区管理的灌溉系统由农民自己运营,管理和维护。农民的管理活动包括引水,输送,调度输水,维护基础设施,对不当行为进行制裁等。这些活动在许多情况下是由用水户协会等机构进行的。这些计划在解决粮食问题上发挥着重要作用。安全问题,特别是在最不发达国家中;在大多数情况下,它们是中小型计划,要求降低投资和运营成本,从而为大量受益人服务。埃塞俄比亚对社区管理的灌溉计划进行了大量投资.rn尽管它们发挥了关键作用,但这些计划受到水资源管理不善和水生产率低下的困扰.rn这项研究是在位于中部的两个社区管理的灌溉计划Golgotarnand Wedecha进行的埃塞俄比亚。该研究旨在使用外部比较指标比较这两种方案的绩效,并找出导致特定绩效水平的内部管理实践。使用三组基准测试(比较)指标,并应用模糊集概念分析农民对灌溉服务的效用。 Golgota方案具有较高的水平。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Tehran(IR);Tehran(IR);Tehran(IR)
  • 作者单位

    UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands Department of Water Resources Irrigation Engineering, ArbaMinch University, Ethiopia E-mail: zelek2@unesco-ihe.org;

    Professor of Land and Water Development, UNSECO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands President Honorary of the InternationalCommission on Irrigation and Drainage, ICID E-mail: b.schultz@unesco-ihe.org;

    UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands Vice chairman, International Commission on Irrigation andDrainage, ICID E-mail: l.hayde@unesco-ihe.org;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农田水利;农田水利;农田水利;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号