【24h】

Financial Models of Intellectual Properties: Lessons from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and U.S.

机译:知识产权的财务模型:日本,韩国,台湾和美国的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the era of Knowledge-based Economy, the intangible intellectual property (IP)rnhas become the core of corporate values, yet it is difficult for companies to financernwith IP, and the obstacle in conducting IP-financing is asymmetric information. In thisrnpaper we reviewed the development in the U.S., Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan andrnfound three effective financial models, including relationship banking, thernloan-guarantee model, and the meeting-platform model. Based on the value-creationrntheory, the relationship-banking theory, the value co-creation perspective, informationrnwe acquired from interviews with banks and credit guarantee institutions in Taiwanrnand Japan, we analyzed how the three financial models work and overcome the issuernof asymmetric information, and also explained why other models fail. Lastly, wernproposed what to be aware of when introducing the three models as references forrncountries introducing these models.
机译:在知识经济时代,无形知识产权已经成为企业价值的核心,但是企业很难通过知识产权来进行融资,知识产权融资的障碍是信息不对称。在本文中,我们回顾了美国,日本,韩国和台湾的发展情况,发现了三种有效的财务模型,包括关系银行业务,银行贷款担保模型和会议平台模型。基于价值创造理论,关系银行理论,价值共同创造视角,从台湾和日本的银行和信用担保机构的访谈中获得的信息,我们分析了这三种金融模型的工作原理并克服了发行不对称信息,以及还解释了为什么其他模型失败。最后,我们提出了引入这三种模型时应注意的事项,作为各国引入这些模型的参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号