首页> 外文会议>2018 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy: Generation and Applications >Differences in locational marginal prices: Deterministic vs. stochastic market formulations
【24h】

Differences in locational marginal prices: Deterministic vs. stochastic market formulations

机译:地区边际价格的差异:确定性市场与随机性市场的表述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Participants in electric energy markets are affected by locational marginal prices that are derived from the day-ahead market's security constrained unit commitment (SCUC) model. Today, the SCUC model utilized in electric energy markets is deterministic and incorporates several approximations. Operators at times are required to modify the deterministic SCUC solution to satisfy all operating and reliability criteria. Thus, the prices derived from the deterministic SCUC model, which do not include the modifications, are inefficient. This study demonstrates a stark difference in market settlements and prices of delivering energy when comparing a deterministic SCUC solution and stochastic (extensive-form) SCUC solution. Even though the stochastic SCUC solution produces more efficient prices and meets all reliability criteria, it currently cannot be used for the day-ahead market due to time constraints. Therefore, electric energy markets still utilize deterministic SCUC models. However, the stochastic SCUC model can be utilized as a benchmark to assess the efficiency an operator's deterministic SCUC.
机译:电能市场的参与者受到位置边际价格的影响,这些边际价格是从日前市场的安全约束单位承诺(SCUC)模型得出的。如今,在电能市场中使用的SCUC模型是确定性的,并包含了一些近似值。有时要求操作员修改确定性SCUC解决方案,以满足所有操作和可靠性标准。因此,从确定性SCUC模型获得的价格(不包括修改)是无效的。这项研究表明,在比较确定性SCUC解决方案和随机(扩展形式)SCUC解决方案时,市场结算和提供能源的价格存在明显差异。即使随机SCUC解决方案可以产生更有效的价格并满足所有可靠性标准,但由于时间限制,当前无法将其用于日间市场。因此,电能市场仍然使用确定性SCUC模型。但是,随机SCUC模型可以用作评估运营商确定性SCUC效率的基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号