首页> 外文会议>2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech >Performance comparison of three main SMPS types under sinusoidal and distorted supply voltage
【24h】

Performance comparison of three main SMPS types under sinusoidal and distorted supply voltage

机译:正弦和失真电源电压下三种主要SMPS类型的性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents detailed results of experimental evaluation of performance of switch-mode power supplies (SMPS') used in standard desktop PCs. The results provide comparison of changes in efficiencies, power factors and waveform distortion of SMPS' operating at different powers and under both ideally sinusoidal and distorted supply voltage conditions. Although a small sample of six SMPS' was tested, they are selected as typical representatives of the three main types of PC-SMPS' regarding used power factor control (PFC) circuits: without PFC (no-PFC), with passive PFC (p-PFC) and with active PFC (a-PFC). The comparison shows that in the high-power operating range (i.e. above 50% of rated power) SMPS' with a-PFC have better performance, i.e. higher efficiencies and power factors, with lower waveform distortions, than no-PFC and p-PFC SMPS'. In the low and very low power ranges, however, the performance of a-PFC SMPS' deteriorates, becoming similar to no-PFC and p-PFC SMPS'.
机译:本文介绍了用于标准台式PC的开关模式电源(SMPS')性能的实验评估的详细结果。结果提供了在理想正弦和失真电源电压条件下在不同功率下工作的SMPS的效率,功率因数和波形失真变化的比较。尽管测试了六个SMPS'的一小部分样本,但它们被选作PC-SMPS'三种主要类型的典型代表,涉及使用的功率因数控制(PFC)电路:无PFC(no-PFC),无源PFC(p -PFC)和活动PFC(a-PFC)。比较表明,与无PFC和p-PFC相比,在a-PFC的大功率工作范围(即额定功率的50%以上)中,SMPS'具有更好的性能,即更高的效率和功率因数以及更低的波形失真SMPS”。但是,在低功率和非常低功率范围内,a-PFC SMPS'的性能会下降,变得类似于no-PFC和p-PFC SMPS'。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号