首页> 外文会议>2017 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries >Open Peer Review in the Era of Open Science: A Pilot Study of Researchers' Perceptions
【24h】

Open Peer Review in the Era of Open Science: A Pilot Study of Researchers' Perceptions

机译:开放科学时代的开放同行评审:研究人员感知的初步研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The quality of Open Access journals is an important issue in developing digital library collections. Traditional criteria, such as peer review, may not be able to identify the quality of peer- reviewed publications. Open peer review (OPR) has emerged as an innovation of open science. OPR is still at an early development stage with various models, from revealing identities of the author and the reviewer to publishing the entire peer review history of the accepted paper. This pilot study utilizes qualitative interviews to investigate researchers' perceptions and attitudes towards the emerging publishing model. Through semi-structured interviews with seven researchers, this pilot study reports on the thoughts and opinions of the interviewees towards OPR and proposes further studies on the potential of OPR in scientific publishing.
机译:开放存取期刊的质量是开发数字图书馆馆藏的重要问题。传统标准(例如同行评审)可能无法确定同行评审出版物的质量。开放式同行评审(OPR)已经成为开放式科学的创新。从揭示作者和审稿人的身份到发布被接受论文的整个同行审阅历史,OPR仍处于各种模型的早期开发阶段。这项初步研究利用定性访谈来调查研究人员对新兴出版模式的看法和态度。通过对七名研究人员的半结构化访谈,该试点研究报告了受访者对OPR的想法和看法,并提出了关于OPR在科学出版中的潜力的进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号