【24h】

It Does Matter Who I sell to and Whom I Buy From: Weighted Bilateral VCG

机译:不管我卖给谁以及从谁那里买东西都很重要:加权双边VCG

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There are special markets where not all buyers are symmetric from the seller's perspective and similarly, there are cases where not all sellers are symmetric from the buyer's perspective. For example when a person attempts to acquire some information it most definitely matters who the information provider/seller is. The higher the reputation an information provider has the more valuable his information is from the advertisers' perspective. The main challenges in such scenarios are the ability to (i) elicit true information from the participants, and (ii) find the most efficient allocation. The VCG could have been a good mechanism for this purpose, however, it is not budget balanced, making it impractical. In this paper we propose the weighted bilateral VCG mechanism which comprises most of the desired economic properties for being strategy proof, and individually rational. Moreover, our mechanism has been shown to be (i) budget balanced for the long term, (ii) does not add complexity overhead to the optimization problem complexity, (iii) may be tuned by the auctioneer using the weight parameter to decide about the level of profit it decides on, and (iv) produces suboptimal allocations which are very close to the optimal ones.
机译:在某些特殊市场中,并非所有买方都从卖方的角度对称,并且类似地,有些情况下并非所有卖方都从买方的角度对称。例如,当一个人试图获取某些信息时,信息提供者/销售者是谁绝对是最重要的。从广告商的角度来看,信息提供者的声誉越高,其信息就越有价值。在这种情况下的主要挑战是(i)从参与者那里获取真实信息,以及(ii)找到最有效的分配的能力。为此目的,VCG可能是一个很好的机制,但是,由于预算不平衡,因此不切实际。在本文中,我们提出了加权的双边VCG机制,该机制包含了大多数所需的经济属性,可以作为战略证明和个人理性。此外,我们的机制已显示为(i)长期实现预算平衡,(ii)不会在优化问题的复杂性上增加复杂性开销,(iii)拍卖师可以使用权重参数来调整预算,以决定它决定的利润水平;(iv)产生与最佳分配非常接近的次优分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号