首页> 外文会议>American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy;ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings >Current Policies and Practices Related to the Incorporation of Non-energy Benefits in Energy Saving Performance Contract Projects
【24h】

Current Policies and Practices Related to the Incorporation of Non-energy Benefits in Energy Saving Performance Contract Projects

机译:与将非能源收益纳入节能绩效合同项目相关的现行政策和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper analyzes current policies and practices related to the incorporation of nonenergyrnmeasures (NEMs) and their benefits to energy saving performance contract (ESPC)rnprojects implemented by the U.S. energy service company (ESCO) industry. Previous researchrnby our team has found that projects in the public and institutional sector are increasingly usingrnESPCs to address various non-energy-related needs (e.g., roof replacement). Unfortunately, therernis no consistent guidance on methodologies for incorporating non-energy benefits (NEBs) intornthe cost/benefit analyses of projects. This paper presents the results of an in-depth review ofrnstate-by-state and federal legislation of the incorporation of non-energy benefits, includingrnmeasures and benefits allowed and restrictions that apply.rnCase studies indicate that the value of NEBs can be as much as 40% or more of the totalrneconomic savings generated by an ESPC project. However, there is significant variation acrossrnregions and levels of government, with regard to how many and which types of non-energyrnmeasures are allowed in ESPC project contracts. There appears to be little or no correlationrnbetween the level of government infrastructure need, which can be extensive, and the number ofrnnon-energy measures allowed by the jurisdiction. The authors recommend standardized,rnsimplified, and transparent methodologies for estimating and verifying the savings generated byrnthe various non-energy measures—in a manner that is analogous to the original development ofrnthe International Performance Monitoring and Verification Protocol (IPMVP).
机译:本文分析了与纳入非能源措施(NEM)及其对美国能源服务公司(ESCO)行业实施的节能绩效合同(ESPC)项目的好处有关的当前政策和做法。我们小组先前的研究发现,公共和机构部门的项目越来越多地使用ESPC来满足各种与能源无关的需求(例如更换屋顶)。不幸的是,没有关于将非能源效益(NEB)纳入项目成本/收益分析的方法的一致指导。本文介绍了对纳入非能源利益的州和州和联邦立法进行深入审查的结果,包括措施和允许的利益以及适用的限制。案例研究表明,NEB的价值可以达到ESPC项目产生的总经济节省的40%或更多。但是,在ESPC项目合同中允许多少种非能源措施以及哪种类型的非能源措施方面,跨地区和政府级别存在很大差异。政府基础设施的需求水平(可能是广泛的)与辖区允许的非能源措施的数量之间似乎没有或几乎没有关联。作者建议采用标准化,简化和透明的方法来估算和验证各种非能源措施所产生的节约,其方式类似于国际绩效监控和核查协议(IPMVP)的最初开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号