首页> 外文会议>American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy;ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings >Still the First Fuel: National Review of the Cost of Utility Energy Efficiency Programs
【24h】

Still the First Fuel: National Review of the Cost of Utility Energy Efficiency Programs

机译:仍然是第一燃料:全国公用事业节能计划成本审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over the past two decades, U.S. energy efficiency programs have been widelyrndocumented as a least-cost resource option compared to new electricity generation. As efficiencyrnprograms gain traction as a robust resource option for energy planners, there is an increasingrnneed for high-quality, comprehensive, and consistent data metrics on the costs and benefits ofrnefficiency programs. This paper summarizes the results of a recent meta-review of energyrnefficiency program costs for 2009–12 in about 20 states (Molina 2014). Data metrics utilized inrnthis review include the levelized cost of saved energy for both electricity and natural gasrnprograms, and costs by customer class. This paper dives deeper into the results to identify trendsrnamong jurisdictions about the relationship between costs and savings thresholds. Finally, thernpaper makes recommendations to improve cost reporting and consistency for efficiencyrnprograms. While utilities and program administrators in some regions have begun to report inrnstandardized formats, other jurisdictions still lag far behind in efficiency program reporting andrncould learn from studying programs in other states and regions.
机译:在过去的二十年中,与新的发电相比,美国的能效计划已被广泛记录为一种成本最低的资源选择。随着效率计划作为能源计划者的可靠资源选择而受到关注,对效率计划的成本和收益的高质量,全面且一致的数据指标的需求日益增长。本文总结了最近的2009-12年度在20个州的能效计划成本的荟萃审查的结果(Molina 2014)。本次审查中使用的数据指标包括电力和天然气计划的节能量的平均成本,以及按客户类别划分的成本。本文对结果进行了更深入的研究,以识别有关成本和储蓄门槛之间关系的趋势辖区。最后,论文提出了改善成本报告和提高效率计划一致性的建议。尽管某些地区的公用事业和计划管理员已开始报告格式不规范的格式,但其他辖区在效率计划报告方面仍然远远落后,可以从研究其他州和地区的计划中学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号