首页> 外文会议>2012 Proceedings of PICMET '12: Technology Management for Emerging Technologies >Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel-centered Living Lab-approach
【24h】

Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel-centered Living Lab-approach

机译:在创新过程中实现最佳用户参与:以小组为中心的Living Lab方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Living Labs as seen as a rather new research area with only a limited amount of supporting theories for understanding this concept. The absence of supporting theories, or rather the lack of agreement regarding the supporting theories has induced on the one hand a proliferation of papers and articles on Living Labs and on the other hand a wide variety of approaches and projects carried out under the Living Labs-umbrella. In short, on a theoretical as well as on a practical level, a further narrowing and specifying of the Living Lab-concept remains a task in progress. Within this research paper, we will show that the Living Lab-approach is in many ways a logical extension of some of the principles of the Open Innovation-concept. In order to aid to the concrete conceptualization of Living Labs, we will give an overview of history of the Living Lab-concept with a focus on characteristics and applications. This allows us to make a meta-analysis of discerning elements that, according to the most recent literature, should or should not be present in best practice Living Labs-research. Based on this meta-analysis and on the literature review, we will construct a modified consensus-definition of the Living Lab-concept as it is currently understood, described and practiced. By adding the ‘panel-centered’ characteristic, we also add a Living Lab-characteristic that remained overlooked in most literature on Living Labs that however bears a large potential in terms of sustainability and added value of Living Labs.
机译:Living Labs被看作是一个相当新的研究领域,只有很少的支持理论可以理解这个概念。缺乏支持性理论,或者缺乏对支持性理论的共识,一方面引起了关于生活实验室的论文和文章的泛滥,另一方面,导致了在生活实验室下进行的各种方法和项目-雨伞。简而言之,无论是从理论还是从实践的角度来看,进一步缩小和确定“生活实验室”的概念仍然是一项艰巨的任务。在这篇研究论文中,我们将表明,“生活实验室”方法在许多方面都是“开放创新”概念中某些原理的逻辑扩展。为了帮助对Living Labs进行具体的概念化,我们将概述Living Lab概念的历史,重点是特性和应用。根据最新的文献,这使我们可以对有区别的元素进行荟萃分析,这些元素应该或不应该出现在最佳实践Living Labs研究中。基于这种荟萃分析和文献综述,我们将构建对“生活实验室”概念的修改后的共识定义,因为它目前已经得到理解,描述和实践。通过添加“以面板为中心”的特征,我们还添加了“生活实验室”的功能,这在大多数关于“生活实验室”的文献中都被忽略了,但是就可持续性和“生活实验室”的增值而言,它具有很大的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号