【24h】

A comparison of dynamic WFST decoding approaches

机译:动态WFST解码方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we perform a comparison of lookahead composition and on-the-fly hypothesis rescoring using a common decoder. The results on a large vocabulary speech recognition task illustrate the differences in the behaviour of these algorithms in terms of error rate, real time factor, memory usage and internal statistics of the decoder. The evaluations were performed when the decoder was operated at either the state or arc level. The results show the dynamic approaches also work well at the state level even though there is greater dynamic construction cost.
机译:在本文中,我们使用普通解码器对超前组成和即时假设记录进行比较。大量词汇语音识别任务的结果说明了这些算法在错误率,实时因子,内存使用情况和解码器内部统计方面的行为差异。当解码器以状态或电弧级别运行时执行评估。结果表明,即使存在较大的动态建设成本,动态方法在州一级也能很好地发挥作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号