首页> 外文会议>2012 IEEE control and system graduate research colloquium >Hybrid Approach using correlation and morphological approaches for GFDD of plain weave fabric
【24h】

Hybrid Approach using correlation and morphological approaches for GFDD of plain weave fabric

机译:基于相关和形态学方法的平纹织物GFDD混合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents the Hybrid Approach (HA) using correlation followed by Morphological Approach (MA) to detect the micro natured defects in fine grey plain weave fabrics. The fundamental method of suspected object detection in an image is achieved using Correlation Approach (CA) to determine correlation of defect template with defect image to detect Region of Interest (ROI). The FFT based correlation technique assisted by appropriate threshold was followed by the MA using suitable Structuring Element (SE) to filter and retain only the defect region and to facilitate the reduction of False Alarm Rate (FAR). Three methods viz., MA, CA and HA were tested and compared for Grey Fabric Defect Detection(GFDD) of plain weave defects of varying sizes. Performance comparison of the three algorithms was carried out by adopting simple binary based Defect Search Algorithm (DSA) as a last step in the experimentation to detect defects. The progressive improvement observed in terms of % Overall Detection Accuracy (ODA) for these three methods was from 22 to 79 for benchmark defect samples and from 25 to 93 for normal samples. Experimentation results on HA showed 3.5 fold increase in ODA for defect samples and about 3.7 fold increase in ODA for normal samples. Though HA method could detect different defects, the drawbacks of this are the selection of the appropriate defect template and selection of SE which is tedious. The details of the experimentation and the results thereof are presented in this paper.
机译:本文提出了使用相关性和形态学方法(MA)的混合方法(HA)来检测细灰色平纹织物中的微观缺陷。使用关联方法(CA)确定缺陷模板与缺陷图像的相关性以检测感兴趣区域(ROI),可以实现图像中可疑对象检测的基本方法。使用适当的阈值辅助的基于FFT的相关技术之后,MA使用适当的结构元素(SE)来仅过滤和保留缺陷区域并有助于减少误报率(FAR)。测试了三种方法,即MA,CA和HA,并比较了各种尺寸的平纹组织缺陷的坯布缺陷检测(GFDD)。这三种算法的性能比较是通过采用基于简单二进制的缺陷搜索算法(DSA)作为检测缺陷的实验的最后一步来进行的。这三种方法的总检测准确度百分比(ODA)方面,基准缺陷样品从22改善到79,普通样品从25改善到93。 HA的实验结果表明,缺陷样品的ODA增加了3.5倍,正常样品的ODA增加了约3.7倍。尽管HA方法可以检测到不同的缺陷,但其缺点是选择合适的缺陷模板和选择SE太繁琐。本文介绍了实验的细节及其结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号