首页> 外文会议>2012 IEEE Conference on Sustainable Utilization and Development in Engineering and Technology. >Energy performance analysis of a Hydro-turbine test lab: An architectural approach
【24h】

Energy performance analysis of a Hydro-turbine test lab: An architectural approach

机译:水轮机测试实验室的能源性能分析:一种架构方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Building energy simulation tests for a proposed office cum Hydro-turbine test lab at IIT Roorkee, India were performed for different window-wall ratios (WWR) in order to find the most energy efficient solution. Results from energy simulation shows that such building with a WWR of 90% will end-up using 2,16,347 kWh per annum. If clear glass is replaced with low transmitting reflective glass and daylight sensors are added to this configuration, annual lighting and air-conditioning energy consumption will reduce by 34.22% and 14.57% respectively. The building was simulated for total nine combinations of WWR and maximum energy savings were established in a combination having 40% WWR in south, east, west façade and 100% WWR in north façade. However, from the point of view of exteriors of the building, a 60% WWR will provide better outside views to its occupants as compared to the building with 40% WWR. It was also observed that providing daylight sensors and reflecting glass do not cost more when integrated with optimum WWR as the additional cost is compensated by savings achieved from energy costs.
机译:为了寻找最节能的解决方案,对印度IIT Roorkee一家拟建的办公室暨水轮机测试实验室进行了建筑能耗模拟测试,测试了不同的窗墙比(WWR)。能源模拟的结果表明,这种WWR为90%的建筑最终将以每年2,16,347 kWh的能耗运行。如果将透明玻璃替换为低透射率反射玻璃,并在此配置中添加日光传感器,则每年的照明和空调能耗将分别减少34.22%和14.57%。对该建筑进行了模拟,总共进行了9个WWR组合,并在南,东,西立面的WWR为40%,在北立面的WWR为100%的组合中实现了最大的节能效果。但是,从建筑物的外部角度来看,与40%的WWR的建筑物相比,60%的WWR可以为居住者提供更好的外部视野。还观察到,与最佳WWR集成时,提供日光传感器和反射玻璃不会花费更多,因为额外的费用可以通过节省能源成本来补偿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号