【24h】

Towards Byzantine Resilient Directories

机译:迈向拜占庭式弹性目录

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Notable Byzantine Fault Tolerant protocols have been designed so far. These protocols are often evaluated on simple benchmarks, and few times on NFS systems. On the contrary, studies that addressed the behavior of BFT on large back-ends, like Directories, are few. We believe that studying such systems is crucial for practice community due to their popularity. In this paper, we integrate BFT with OpenLDAP Directory. We introduce the design of the integrated system, that we call BFT-LDAP. Then, we study its behavior accompanied with some useful observations. In addition, we discuss the cost overhead of this integration. Our approach ensures that OpenLDAP legacy code remains completely intact, and that the integration with BFT is straightforward using APIs. Moreover, we convey that the additional performance cost of BFT-LDAP is negligible as compared to that of stand-alone OpenLDAP. We conducted our experiments on Emulab. The experiments indicate that the performance discrepancy of BFT-LDAP is negligible whenever different state-of-the-art BFT protocols are used. Other experiments demonstrate that a little sacrifice in throughput (less than 10%) is needed in order to leverage the resiliency of OpenLDAP against Byzantine faults (i.e., through applying BFT).
机译:到目前为止,已经设计了著名的拜占庭容错协议。这些协议通常以简单的基准进行评估,而很少在NFS系统上进行评估。相反,针对BFT在大型后端(如目录)上的行为的研究很少。我们认为,研究此类系统的普及对实践社区至关重要。在本文中,我们将BFT与OpenLDAP Directory集成在一起。我们介绍称为BFT-LDAP的集成系统的设计。然后,我们结合一些有用的观察来研究其行为。另外,我们讨论了这种集成的成本开销。我们的方法可确保OpenLDAP旧版代码保持完整无缺,并且使用API​​可以轻松与BFT集成。而且,我们认为与独立的OpenLDAP相比,BFT-LDAP的额外性能成本可以忽略不计。我们在Emulab上进行了实验。实验表明,只要使用不同的最新BFT协议,BFT-LDAP的性能差异就可以忽略不计。其他实验表明,为了利用OpenLDAP的弹性来抵抗拜占庭式错误(即通过应用BFT),需要牺牲吞吐量(少于10%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号