首页> 外文会议>2012 Fourth World Congress on Nature and Biologically Inspired Computing. >A comparison of genetic algorithms and genetic programming in solving the school timetabling problem
【24h】

A comparison of genetic algorithms and genetic programming in solving the school timetabling problem

机译:遗传算法与遗传程序设计在解决学校时间表问题中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we compare the performance of genetic algorithms and genetic programming in solving a set of hard school timetabling problems. Genetic algorithms search a solution space whereas genetic programming explores a program space. While previous work has examined the use of genetic algorithms in solving the school timetabling problem, there has not been any research on the use of genetic programming for this domain. The GA explores a space of timetables to find an optimal timetable. GP on the other hand searches for an optimal program which when executed will produce a solution. Each program is comprised of operators for timetable construction. The GA and GP were tested on the Abramson set of school timetabling problems. Genetic programming proved to be more effective than genetic algorithms in solving this set of problems. Furthermore, the results produced by both the GA and GP were found to be comparative to methods applied to the same set of problems.
机译:在本文中,我们比较了遗传算法和遗传编程在解决一组严格的时间表问题时的性能。遗传算法搜索解决方案空间,而遗传编程探索程序空间。尽管先前的工作已经研究了遗传算法在解决学校时间表问题中的应用,但尚未对该领域使用遗传编程进行任何研究。大会探索时间表的空间以找到最佳时间表。另一方面,GP搜索最佳程序,该程序执行后将产生解决方案。每个程序都由用于制定时间表的操作员组成。 GA和GP在Abramson一组学校时间表问题上进行了测试。在解决这一系列问题方面,事实证明,遗传编程比遗传算法更有效。此外,发现GA和GP产生的结果都与应用于同一组问题的方法相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号