首页> 外文会议>Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2011 IEEE >A comparison study on ray-driven approximation in re-projection and back-projection for CT reconstruction
【24h】

A comparison study on ray-driven approximation in re-projection and back-projection for CT reconstruction

机译:CT重建中射线驱动逼近的反投影与反投影比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ray-driven technique is very important for computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction. It has been reported that the weighting factor in ray-driven technique can be obtained by calculating the intersection length (distance-weighting) or area (area-weighting) of a projection line or strip with an image pixel. Recently, we presented a method which considers the intersection volume as weighting factor (volume-weighting) in fully three-dimensional (3D) imaging. In this work, we presented the performances of these three different weighting techniques by computer simulation studies. We first generated a 3D continuous Shepp-Logan phantom and computed the sinogram data analytically as the reference. Then the sinogram data with the three different weighting techniques were simulated. It can be observed that the profile obtained by the analytical solution is smooth while the three weighting methods show noticeable unevenness. The unevenness is inevitable due to the induced error by the digitalization process and finite image resolution. While the volume weighting achieved slightly better performance than the area weighting and both of them showed noticeable improvements compared to the distance weighting. We also compared their reconstruction performances using filtered backprojection (FBP) and Feldkamp (FDK) algorithms for 2D and 3D cases, respectively. The gain by the use of volume-weighting was measured, as compared to others, by the standard variation in selected regions of interest in the reconstructions. One drawback about the volume weighting is the need of intensive computation. It costs about ten times more computation as compared to the distance weighting and about three times more computation to the area weighting. Though this should not be a major concern for sinogram restoration and analytical reconstruction, it might limit the use when using iterative algorithms. Optimization of the volume weighting for fast computation and comparison of the ray-driven techn-nque with other methods are under investigation.
机译:射线驱动技术对于计算机断层扫描(CT)图像重建非常重要。据报道,可以通过计算投影线或带与图像像素的相交长度(距离加权)或面积(面积加权)来获得射线驱动技术中的加权因子。最近,我们提出了一种方法,该方法在完全三维(3D)成像中将相交体积视为加权因子(体积加权)。在这项工作中,我们通过计算机仿真研究介绍了这三种不同加权技术的性能。我们首先生成了一个3D连续Shepp-Logan体模,然后分析计算了正弦图数据作为参考。然后模拟了三种不同加权技术的正弦图数据。可以看出,通过分析溶液获得的轮廓是平滑的,而三种加权方法显示出明显的不均匀性。由于数字化过程引起的误差和有限的图像分辨率,不均匀是不可避免的。尽管体积加权比区域加权具有更好的性能,并且与距离加权相比,它们都显示出明显的改进。我们还比较了分别在2D和3D情况下使用滤波反投影(FBP)和Feldkamp(FDK)算法的重建性能。与其他方法相比,通过体积加权来衡量收益,是通过重建中选定目标区域的标准差来衡量的。关于体积加权的一个缺点是需要大量的计算。与距离权重相比,它的计算成本要高出大约十倍,而面积权重则要高出大约三倍。尽管这不是正弦图恢复和分析重建的主要关注点,但在使用迭代算法时可能会限制使用。正在研究优化音量加权以进行快速计算以及将射线驱动技术与其他方法进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号